Skip to main content
iRubric: Literary Analysis Rubric

iRubric: Literary Analysis Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Literary Analysis Rubric 
Critical Analysis Rubric
Rubric to assess students' ability to construct a critical analysis that uses textual evidence to defend an argument
Rubric Code: FAX878
By Sammyosb
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Critical Review Submission
  Inconsistant

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Very Good

(N/A)

Thesis Statement

Inconsistant

Writer's stance on the argument (thesis) is not clear.
Good

Writer states argument. Argument is somewhat developed.
Very Good

Writer clearly states his or her position. Writer's argument is thoughtful, complex and thoroughly explained.
Thesis Strands

Inconsistant

In the introduction the points of the argument (thesis strands) are not explained.
Good

In the introduction the points of the argument (thesis strands) are explained, but not clearly.
Very Good

In the introduction the points of the argument (thesis strands) are explained, clearly.
Introduction

Inconsistant

Introduction does not include a thesis statement or thesis strands.
Good

Introduction includes a thesis statement and thesis strands.
Very Good

Has a clear introduction, thesis statements and thesis strands that relate to the body paragraphs and conclusion.
Body Paragraphs

Inconsistant

Body paragraphs do not relate to the thesis statement and thesis strands. B paragraphs are not clear.
Good

Body paragraphs relate to the thesis strands, although they may not include topic sentences or be clear.
Very Good

Body paragraphs have topic sentences that relate to the thesis strands and run-on logically. Conclusion summarizes the point of the essay.
Conclusion

Inconsistant

Main points are not restated in the conclusion clearly and there is no connection back to the introduction.
Good

The main points are restated clearly but not in a new way. There is a connection back to the introduction but it needs to be clearer.
Very Good

The main points are restated clearly and in a new way. There is a clear connection back to the introduction.
Textual Evidence

Inconsistant

Evidence is not specific. Writer does not include at least three pieces of textual evidence. Evidence is simple and not fully explored. Evidence does not support the writer's argument/thesis.
Good

Includes at least three textual references to back up thesis, but they are not thoroughly explained or examined. Evidence is not specific and/or does not support the writer's argument/thesis statement.
Very Good

Includes at least three textual references to back up thesis. This evidence is specific and thoroughly examined. Evidence is quoted or paraphrased and clearly supports the writer's argument.
Mechanics

Inconsistant

The submission clearly has not been edited. There are numerous spelling, punctuation errors, and sentence structure problems.
Good

There are few spelling errors. Student uses mostly proper grammar, including correct punctuation and sentence structure in most cases.
Very Good

Uses correct grammar, including spelling, punctuation and sentence structure. Sentences are complete. Student uses capitalization where needed. Work has clearly been edited.



Keywords:
  • Critical, Analysis, Textual Evidence, Argument


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16