Skip to main content
iRubric: Group Psychologist Conflict Letter rubric

iRubric: Group Psychologist Conflict Letter rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Group Psychologist Conflict Letter 
SQuIIDS
This rubric is designed to give feedback to students on an analytical body paragraph (such as would be found in an expository essay). [S]elect [Qu]otation [I]dentify [I]ntegrate [D]iscuss [S]ignificance
Rubric Code: F4CWBB
By ShelleyRo
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric SQuIIDS
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Content

Excellent

Ideas are:
- original
- interesting
- debatable
- provable
- sophisticated/ nuanced
- specific
- use literary terms very effectively
Good

Ideas are:
- sound
- debatable
- provable
- specific
- use literary terms well
Fair

Ideas are:
- sound but may be superficial
- somewhat debatable
- may be difficult to prove
- general
- may or may not use literary terms
- may misuse literary terms
Poor

Ideas are:
- plot summary/based
- superficial
- general
- not debatable
- not provable
- no literary terms
- misuse literary terms
Topic Sentence

Excellent

- sophisticated, interesting claim
- clearly stated
- concise
- vibrant language `and/or sophisticated sentence structure
Good

- claim
- clearly stated
- good language and/or sentence structure
Fair

- partial claim or plot summary
- may be not be clearly stated/confusing
- weak language and/or sentence structure
Poor

- no claim or incomplete thought
- plot summary
- weak language
- faulty sentence structure and/or misuse of language/vocab
Organization

Excellent

-Points build logically to create compelling argument
- Weaves different points together fluidly
- Effective transitions between points
-Paragraph focuses only on one idea
Good

-Points build logically to create argument
-Effective transitions between points
-Paragraph focuses only on one idea
Fair

-Points are arranged with no clear order
-Some points disconnected from main idea
-Poor or awkward transitions
-Paragraph lacks clear focus/too many ideas for one paragraph
Poor

-Few analytical points (more plot summary)
- difficult to understand main idea because paragraph lacks clear organizational structure
- may have too many ideas in one paragraph
-No transitions
Textual Support

Excellent

- Specific language within quotes is analyzed thoroughly and explained clearly to show relevance to the writer's argument
-Quotes are drawn from different parts of the text to demonstrate an understanding of the novel as a whole
Good

- Quotes are analyzed and explained in some detail to show relevance to the writer's argument
-Quotes come from different parts of the text
Fair

- Quotes are explained in a general way, but with no reference to specific language or details
- Quotes are drawn from only limited parts of the text
Poor

- Quotes simply appear without explanation or analysis
- Quotes are not relevant to the idea of the paragraph
Textual Integration

Excellent

-Quotes are introduced effectively and integrated well into the writer's prose
Good

-Quotes are introduced effectively with some integration into the writer's prose
Fair

-Quotes are not introduced effectively with no attempts at integration
-Block quotations
Poor

-Quotes are not introduced
-Quotes are not integrated
-No quotes
STYLE & MECHANICS
Style

Excellent

-Rich, effective use of vocabulary
-Uses a variety of long and short sentences
-No use of contractions or vague pronouns
-Sentences are clear and structured effectively.
Good

-Effective use of vocabulary
-Moderately successful in varying sentence structure
-Minor flaws in usage of contractions or vague pronouns
Fair

-Simple vocabulary
-little sentence variety
-Overuse of contractions or vague pronouns
-Some errors in sentence structure
Poor

-Simple vocabulary
-No sentence variety
-Inappropriate stylistic choices
Mechanics

Excellent

-Cites correctly
-Free from errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar
Good

-Only cites some of the time or citations are only partially correct
-Several minor errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar
Fair

-Does not cite or cites completely incorrectly
-Enough errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar to be noticeable
Poor

-Does not cite at all
-Enough errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar to be distracting to readers



Keywords:
  • thesis, expository writing, textual analysis, paragraph

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98