Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Feldman Method Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Feldman Method Rubric
Feldman Method Rubric
Assesses student understanding and application of art criticism steps using Feldman's 4 step Art Criticism model
Rubric Code:
F2WXBCC
By
amaconi
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Feldman Method of Art criticism
Exemplary Work 4
(N/A)
Good/Met the Standards 3
(N/A)
Emerging/Standards Lacking 2
(N/A)
Poor/Weak or non-existent 1
(N/A)
Description
Exemplary Work 4
Student makes an exemplary and detailed description of the elements and principles of design seen in the artwork. Student uses descriptive adjectives and words as if the listener could draw the artwork according to what was written. Student provides a color copy of the image.
Good/Met the Standards 3
Student makes a good description of the elements and principles of design seen in the artwork. Student uses a fair amount of descriptive adjectives and words as if the listener could draw the artwork according to what was written. Student provides a color copy of the image.
Emerging/Standards Lacking 2
Student makes a fair description of the elements and principles of design seen in the artwork. Student does not use many descriptive adjectives and words as if the listener could draw the artwork according to what was written. Student provides a black and white of the image.
Poor/Weak or non-existent 1
Student makes a poor and detailed description of the elements and principles of design seen in the artwork. Student uses few or no descriptive adjectives and words as if the listener could draw the artwork according to what was written. Student provides no copy of the image.
Analysis
Exemplary Work 4
Student makes an exemplary and detailed analysis of the artwork by examining the relationships between the different Elements of Art and the Principles of Design.
Good/Met the Standards 3
Student makes a good and detailed analysis of the artwork by examining the relationships between the different Elements of Art and the Principles of Design.
Emerging/Standards Lacking 2
Student makes a fair analysis of the artwork by examining the relationships between the different Elements of Art and the Principles of Design.
Poor/Weak or non-existent 1
Student makes a poor analysis of the artwork by examining the relationships between the different Elements of Art and the Principles of Design.
Interpretation
Exemplary Work 4
Student forms a reasonable hypothesis about the subject matter and the symbolic or metaphorical meaning of the artwork and is able to support this with evidence from the artwork. Explains why the artist made the choices he/she did.
Good/Met the Standards 3
Student identifies the literal meaning of the artwork. Gives a partial interpretation of symbolic meaning with some evidence from the artwork.
Emerging/Standards Lacking 2
Student can relate how the work makes him/her feel personally. Does not give evidence from artwork, does not talk about the symbolic meaning of the artwork.
Poor/Weak or non-existent 1
Student finds it difficult to interpret any meaning in the work.
Judgement
Exemplary Work 4
Student locates the work in an art historical context. Student uses multiple criteria to judge the artwork, such as composition, creativity, design, communication of ideas, successfulness of the image. Talks about what the artist was trying to communicate and gives clear reasons.
Good/Met the Standards 3
Student locates the work in an art historical context. Student uses 1-2 criteria to judge the artwork. Tells whether the artwork is successful or not and talks about what the artist was trying to communicate but could be clearer.
Emerging/Standards Lacking 2
Student locates the work in an art historical context. Student tries to use aesthetic criteria to judge artwork, but does not apply the criteria accurately. Does not explain whether or not the artwork is successful.
Poor/Weak or non-existent 1
Student locates the work in an art historical context. Student evaluates valuates work as good or bad based on personal taste only. Student doesn't comment on what the artist was trying to communicate. Student does not explain whether or not the artwork is successful.
Total
Exemplary Work 4
Good/Met the Standards 3
Emerging/Standards Lacking 2
Poor/Weak or non-existent 1
Keywords:
art criticism
Subjects:
Arts and Design
Types:
Project
Writing
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.