iRubric: Three Perspectives rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Three Perspectives

Poetry Analysis

Writer's Workshop

Rubric Code: F286W2

By tmwilliams

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: (none)

Personal Narrative Criteria
	A Exemplary (N/A)	B Proficient (N/A)	C Satisfactory (N/A)	D Deficient (N/A)
Content	A Exemplary Narratives centers on an object and each setting creates a distinctly unique and creative single focus for each of the 3 perspectives. Narratives contain original and descriptive elements that captivate and engage the reader.	B Proficient Narratives center on an object and each setting creates a unique focus for each of the 3 perpectives. Narrative elements for each of the 3 perspectives engage the reader and each contains orginal and creative elements.	C Satisfactory Narrative centers on an object and the settings create a somewhat unique focus, although the combination may not be unique or original. Description and narrative elements are ordinary and predictable.	D Deficient Seemingly random choice of object and setting. Description and narrative elements are poorly described or very general in nature. Content is not well-developed.
Style and word choice	A Exemplary Narratives use well-placed, clear, and interesting supporting description and/or dialogue to capture the reader's attention. Word choice is vivid and highly effective. Narratives in all three perspectives are extremely well woven.	B Proficient Narratives use generally effective supporting description and/or dialogue. Most of the diction is vivid and effective, but some parts could be improved on. Narratives and descriptive elements are generally well-woven.	C Satisfactory Narratives contain some suppporting description and dialogue, but they tend to be general or predictable. Diction is not vivid. Narratives are awkwardly woven in places.	D Deficient Narratives contain very general supporting description or dialogue. Diction is confusing, vague, or dull. Narratives seem fragmented or incomplete.
Organization	A Exemplary The sequence of events, placement of image and descriptions of landscape enhance understanding and effect in all 3 perspectives. Author clearly put thought into organization.	B Proficient The organization is not confusing, but one part may seem out of place or awkward. Author clearly put thought into organization but structure does not flow smoothly through the narrative as a whole.	C Satisfactory The organization needs smoother flow. Parts seem confusing and overall effect lacks smoothness. Conclusion may be weak.	D Deficient The organization makes the paper hard to follow at times. Conclusion may be vaugue or missing.
Conventions	A Exemplary Narratives contain few to no errors in standard grammar, punctuation and spelling. Any non-standard usage is intentional and effective.	B Proficient Narratives contain some errors in standard grammar, punctuation and/or spelling, but errors do not distract from the work as a whole.	C Satisfactory Narratives contain errors a number of errors in standard grammar and punctuation and/or spelling, but the narratives are understandable and not significantly compromised by errors.	D Deficient Narratives contain many errors. The amount and/or type of errors greatly distract the reader and make the narrtives difficult to understand.
Voice	A Exemplary Writing contains a distinct and engaging voice. Emotions and reactions to the topic are clear and distinct.	B Proficient Writing contains a distinct and interesting voice for the majority of the narratives but it may be inconsistent in one or two places.	C Satisfactory Writing contains some sense of a distinct voice but it is inconsistent.	D Deficient Writing contains little or no distinct voice.

Keywords:

narrative, perspective

Subjects:

English

Types:

Discuss this rubric