Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Ethics Movie Assignment - Written Paper - Grading Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Ethics Movie Assignment - Written Paper - Grading Rubric
Internship Experience - Written Paper - Grading Rubric
Movies: Serpico, Snowden, The Departed
Rubric Code:
E229796
By
Lacy_Ellis
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Ethical Dilemma Analysis
Excellent
40 pts
Good
30 pts
Fair
20 pts
Poor
10 pts
Ethical Dilemma 1
Excellent
Student identified an appropriate ethical dilemma from their chosen movie. Student provided a strong analysis using the Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas process. Student justified their analysis with strong reasoning and support from external sources.
Good
Student identified an appropriate ethical dilemma from their chosen movie. Student provided a good analysis using the Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas process. Student justified their analysis with some reasoning and support from external sources.
Fair
Student had some difficulty identifying an appropriate ethical dilemma from their chosen movie. Student provided a weak analysis using the Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas process. Some steps were missed, incomplete, or lacking. Student reasoning was weak and there was very little support from external sources.
Poor
Student could not identify an appropriate ethical dilemma from their chosen movie. Student did not provide an analysis using the Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas process. Steps were missed, incomplete, or lacking. There was no applied logic or support from external sources.
Ethical Dilemma 2
Excellent
Student identified an appropriate ethical dilemma from their chosen movie. Student provided a strong analysis using the Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas process. Student justified their analysis with strong reasoning and support from external sources.
Good
Student identified an appropriate ethical dilemma from their chosen movie. Student provided a good analysis using the Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas process. Student justified their analysis with some reasoning and support from external sources.
Fair
Student had some difficulty identifying an appropriate ethical dilemma from their chosen movie. Student provided a weak analysis using the Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas process. Some steps were missed, incomplete, or lacking. Student reasoning was weak and there was very little support from external sources.
Poor
Student could not identify an appropriate ethical dilemma from their chosen movie. Student did not provide an analysis using the Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas process. Steps were missed, incomplete, or lacking. There was no applied logic or support from external sources.
Career Reflection & Plan
Excellent
40 pts
Good
30 pts
Fair
20 pts
Poor
10 pts
Depth of Reflection
Excellent
Writing demonstrates an in-depth reflection on the student's career. The student has a realistic expectation of the ethical dilemmas they may face throughout their career. The student has a strong plan for managing difficult situations throughout their career.
Good
Writing demonstrates some reflection on the student's career. The student has a basic understanding and expectation of the ethical dilemmas they may face throughout their career. The student has a good plan for managing difficult situations throughout their career.
Fair
Writing demonstrates minimal reflection on the student's career. The student has weak understanding of the ethical dilemmas they may face throughout their career. The student has a weak/unrealistic plan for managing difficult situations throughout their career.
Poor
Writing demonstrates a lack of reflection on the student's career. The student has no understanding of the ethical dilemmas they may face throughout their career. The student does not have a plan for managing difficult situations throughout their career.
Writing Quality
Excellent
15 pts
Good
10 pts
Fair
5 pts
Poor
0 pts
Structure & Organization
Excellent
Writing is clear, concise, and well organized with the use of excellent sentence/paragraph structure. Thoughts are expressed in a logical manner. APA format is used with only one/two errors throughout the entire paper. All writing requirements and page length requirements are met.
Good
Writing is mostly clear, concise, and organized with good sentence/paragraph structure. Thoughts are expressed in a logical manner. APA format is used with minor errors. All writing requirements and page length requirements are met.
Fair
Writing is at times unclear, and/or thoughts are not well organized. Contains only minimal basic information, with no in depth exploration. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. APA format is used, but has several errors throughout. Some of the writing requirements and page length requirements are not met.
Poor
Writing unclear, disorganized. Thoughts make little to no sense. Learning is not demonstrated. APA format is not used. Writing and page length requirements are not met.
Grammar
Excellent
There are no more than three spelling or grammar errors per page of writing.
Good
There are no more than five spelling or grammar errors per page of writing.
Fair
There are more than five spelling or grammar errors per page of writing.
Poor
There are numerous spelling or grammar errors per page, making understanding/comprehension difficult.
Subjects:
Health
Vocational
Education
Types:
Writing
ePortfolio
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Health rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.