Skip to main content
iRubric: Comparative Anatomy Paper rubric

iRubric: Comparative Anatomy Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Comparative Anatomy Paper 
Comparative Anatomy Paper
Compare/Contrast of Chordate Classes 64 points total value
Rubric Code: DX9B322
By jleekids3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Comparative Analysis
A paper to compare and contrast the chordate classes on select body systems.
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Introduction

Should contain background information about animals in general, Chordates and the 4 classes being covered.
Poor

Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic.
Fair

Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given for groups.
Good

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples for each group.
Excellent

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples for each group.
Integumentary compare/contrast

Compare/Contrast the 4 classes
DOUBLE VALUE
Poor

Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic.
Fair

Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given for groups.
Good

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples for each group.
Excellent

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples for each group.
Musculoskeletal compare/contrast

Compare/Contrast the 4 classes
TRIPLE VALUE
Poor

Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic.
Fair

Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given for groups.
Good

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples for each group.
Excellent

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples for each group.
Respiratory compare/contrast

Compare/Contrast the 4 classes
DOUBLE VALUE
Poor

Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic.
Fair

Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given for groups.
Good

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples for each group.
Excellent

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples for each group.
Digestive compare/contrast

Compare/Contrast the 4 classes
DOUBLE VALUE
Poor

Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic.
Fair

Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given for groups.
Good

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples for each group.
Excellent

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples for each group.
Reproductive compare/contrast

Compare/Contrast the 4 classes
DOUBLE VALUE
Poor

Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic.
Fair

Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given for groups.
Good

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples for each group.
Excellent

Information clearly relates to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples for each group.
Human Comparison & Conclusion

Compare & contrast to humans (paragraph)
Wrap up the analysis by tying everything together (paragraph)
DOUBLE VALUE
Poor

Neither main topic was made nor points reviewed.
Fair

Main topic was restated or points were reviewed but not both. OR Main topic was made, but not all points were covered.
Good

Main topic was restated and points were reviewed.
Excellent

Main topic was restated, points were reviewed and additional comments were made.
Grammar, Spelling, Language

Used correctly spelled words, properly used grammar/punctutation and used appropriate terminology for anatomy and lab
Poor

Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. (5 or more)
Fair

A few grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors. (3-4)
Good

Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors (1-2)
Excellent

No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
Diagrams and Illustrations

Make use of diagrams and personal illustrations to assist with reader understanding
Poor

Diagrams and illustrations are not accurate OR do not add to the reader's understanding of the topic.
Fair

Diagrams and illustrations are neat and accurate and sometimes add to the reader's understanding of the topic.
Good

Diagrams and illustrations are accurate and add to the reader's understanding of the topic.
Excellent

Diagrams and illustrations are neat, accurate and add to the reader's understanding of the topic.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16