- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Debate over WWII sides rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Debate over WWII sides Students were sorted using the Four Corners method into 4 separate groups. Over two class periods, they worked together, gathering information to support their given argument regarding two statements having to do with WWII. Each group was put up against another for one of the statements. Rubric Code: DX2729B By JLopezAlvarez Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8

Classroom Debate
	Excellent 3 pts	Progressing 2 pts	Insufficient 1 pts
Notes- Completion	Excellent The notes provided by the student were complete, showing organization, prepping 5 facts to support their arguments, and supporting details for all.	Progressing The notes provided by the student were incomplete, showing organization, but did not prep the required number of facts to support their arguments, or supporting details for all.	Insufficient The notes provided by the student were incomplete, showing little organization, and did not prep the required number of facts to support their arguments, or supporting details for all.
Organization	Excellent Student's speech and written notes were organized well and easy to understand. There was no difficulty understanding the student during the debate, as their ideas flowed naturally in the conversation.	Progressing Student's speech and written notes were organized somewhat well and fairly easy to understand. There was little difficulty understanding the student during the debate, as their ideas flowed somewhat naturally in the conversation.	Insufficient Student's speech and written notes were not organized well nor were they easy to understand. There was difficulty understanding the student during the debate, as their ideas did not flow naturally in the conversation.
Content	Excellent Content spoken by the student was accurate and easy to understand. No factual inaccuracies were voiced or written.	Progressing Content spoken by the student was accurate and usually easy to understand. No factual inaccuracies were voiced or written.	Insufficient Content spoken by the student was inaccurate and/or hard to understand. Some factual inaccuracies were voiced or written.
Teamwork	Excellent Student worked well within their team, and addressed the points of the opposition. They did not take the majority of time from their group, nor did they remain too quiet during the debate.	Progressing The student did a fair job in addressing the opposition, and spoke enough to express an accurate idea within the debate.	Insufficient The student monopolized time within their group or did not speak sufficiently, or did not address the opposition when speaking.