iRubric: Debate Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Debate Rubric

Assess Oral presentation and Research Preparation

Rubric Code: D492B2

By dlyles88

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: (none)

Debate Rubric
	Excellent The range for this column is 76-100. 100 pts	Good The range for this column is 51-75. 75 pts	Fair The range for this column is 26-50. 50 pts	Poor The range for this column is 1-25. 25 pts
Information 40 %	Excellent All information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough. A Works Cited page of at least five resources and 10 notecards were submitted to instructor.	Good Most information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough. A Works Cited page of at least four resources and 8 notecards were submitted to instructor.	Fair Most information in the debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough. A Works Cited page of at least three resources and 6 notecards were submitted to instructor.	Poor Information had several inaccuracies or was usually not clear. A Works Cited page of at least two resources and 4 notecards were submitted to instructor.
Presentation Style 10 %	Excellent Team consistently used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept attention and was appropriate.	Good Team usually used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.	Fair Team sometimes used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.	Poor One or more of the members of the team had a presentation style that did not keep the attention of the audience.
Organization 20 %	Excellent All arguments were clearly tied to an idea and organized in a tight, logical fashion.	Good Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea and organized in a tight, logical fashion.	Fair All arguments were clearly tied to an idea, but the organization was sometimes not clear or logical.	Poor Arguments were not clearly tied to an idea.
Rate Individual membrs 10 %	Excellent Name-most effective _________________ _________________ _________________	Good Name-Very effective _________________ _________________ _________________	Fair Name-Fair presentation _________________ _________________ _________________	Poor Name-Poor contribution _________________ _________________ _________________
Understanding of topic 20 %	Excellent Team worked well and demonstrated clear knowledge and presented issues clearly.	Good Team demonstrated a basic knowledge and provided valid points of discussion.	Fair Team was not well prepared but presented thoughts and was able to discuss issues.	Poor Team was disorganized, ill prepared and did not present information that was important and persuasive to the cause.