- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Article- Evenement Courrant rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Article- Evenement Courrant Article Review Students will select an article from any event that occurred over the summer. The student will summarize and review the article, making sure to use correct French language. The student will also provide a copy of the article Rubric Code: CXW876B By smhamilton Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Foreign Languages Type: Assignment Grade Levels: K-5, 9-12

Article Review Enter rubric description
	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Sentence Fluency 1 pts	Good All intended messages are clearly expressed.	Fair Almost all intended messages are clearly expressed.	Poor Some intended messages are clearly expressed.
Organization 1 pts	Good Details are placed in a logical order and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.	Fair Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are presented/introduced sometimes makes the writing less interesting.	Poor Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader.
Spelling and Grammar 1 pts	Good Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.	Fair Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.	Poor Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
Quality 1 pts	Good All sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud. Each sentence is clear and has an obvious emphasis.	Fair Almost all sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but 1 or 2 are stiff and awkward or difficult to understand.	Poor Most sentences sound natural and are easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but several are stiff and awkward or are difficult to understand.
Focus on Topic 1 pts	Good There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main idea stands out and is supported by detailed information.	Fair Main idea is clear but the supporting information is general.	Poor Main idea is somewhat clear but there is a need for more supporting information.