Skip to main content
iRubric: Analysis of Short story rubric

iRubric: Analysis of Short story rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Analysis of Short story 
Analysis of Short story
Literary Lens Presentation using Short Story 1. Focus of Critical Lens 2. The analysis of short story 3. The summary of the short story. 4. The quality of the powerpoint/poster or other visual aids used in the presentation. 5. The quality of the oral presentation.
Rubric Code: CXB564A
By litsam
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Literary Lens Presentation of Story
  Level 4

(N/A)

Level 3

(N/A)

Level 2

(N/A)

Below Level 1

(N/A)

Literary Lens Explanation

Oral: /10
Level 4

Student explained the literary lens in a manner that demonstrated complete understanding.
Level 3

Student explained the literary lens, with considerable effectiveness and understanding.
Level 2

Student gave a brief description of literary lens, but did not show thorough understanding of the lens.
Below Level 1

Students discussed the literary lens, but demonstrated lack of understanding of the literary approach. Or, students did not address literary lens.
Summary and Understanding

Oral: /5
Level 4

Students gave an effective summary of the short story, showing complete understanding of the narrative.
Level 3

Students gave a summary of the short story, showing considerable understanding of the narrative.
Level 2

Students gave a summary of the short story, but exemplified errors in their understanding of the story.
Below Level 1

The students did not summarize the short story or showed a lack of understanding of the narrative.
Analysis of Story through Lens

Oral: /25
Level 4

Students created exceptional questions to analyze and demonstrate their understanding of the story through the critical lens.
Level 3

Students created good questions to analyze and demonstrate their understanding of the story through the critical lens.
Level 2

Students created satisfactory questions to analyze and demonstrate their understanding of the story through the critical lens.
Below Level 1

Students did not create any meaningful questions to analyze and demonstrate their understanding of the story through the critical lens. Or, students created questions that did not apply to the critical lens assigned.
Language

Oral: /10
Level 4

Speaks with expression/ appropriate emphasis.

Interesting, formal diction and tone used within the talk.
Level 3

Speaks at suitable pace and volume that suits the speech.

Apt diction and tone for the purpose of the talk.
Level 2

Speaks at suitable pace and volume that suits the speech most of the time.
Average diction and appropriate tone.
Below Level 1

Speaks too quietly and rapidly.

Low-level diction and monotone speech.
Delivery

Oral: /5
Level 4

Consistent use of eye contact throughout the entire speech.

Strong sense of audience and purpose.

Uses natural effective gestures.

Confident and natural posture throughout.

Exceptional timing and conclusion.
Level 3

Maintains continual eye contact.

Clear sense of audience and purpose.

Uses appropriate gestures effectively.

Consistent control.

Appropriate timing; concludes.
Level 2

Inconsistent use of eye contact.

Some sense of audience and purpose.

Uses some appropriate gestures.

Inconsistent control.

Inappropriate timing. Barely concludes.
Below Level 1

Does not make eye contact.

Little sense of audience and purpose.

Uses few and/or inappropriate gestures.

Lacks control, e.g., giggling and/or fidgeting.
Too long/short. Makes no attempt to conclude.
Quality of Powerpoint/Visual Aids

Media: /25
Level 4

Students' visual aides were excellent and clearly demonstrated mastery of the assignment. Students used font, colour, images, etc. with a high degree of effectiveness. Very few to no grammar or punctuation errors.Presentation is clear and well-organized.
Level 3

Students used visual aides that showed a good understanding of the work and the concepts involved in the work.Students used font, colour, images, etc. with considerable effectiveness.
Minor grammar or punctuation errors. Presentation is clear and generally well-organized.
Level 2

Students used visual aids to enhance the presentation, but could have developed them more to produce an effective media product. Errors in grammar or punctuation detracted from powerpoint or visual. Presentation is vague and poorly organized.
Below Level 1

Students used visual aids to enhance the presentation, but the presentations were lacking in depth and understanding of the form. Numerous errors in grammar and punctuation. Presentation is not clear and is disjointed.
Total Oral Mark
/55
Total Media Mark

/25
Level 4
Level 3
Level 2
Below Level 1



Keywords:
  • short story analysis by a group



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16