Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Venturing into the Media Paper Rubric

iRubric: Venturing into the Media Paper Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Venturing into the Media Paper Rubric Venturing into the Media Paper Rubric This rubric is used to grade the 3-4 page Venturing into the Media paper. (50 points) Rubric Code: CX9AA52 By kevinmatthewfry Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Psychology Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Content 40 points
	Poor Does not meet expectations 5 pts	Fair Partially meets expectations 6 pts	Good Mostly meets expectations 8 pts	Excellent Fully meets or exceeds expectations 10 pts
TED Talk/Podcast 10 pts Relevance of TED Talk/podcast to psychology and appropriateness for assignment	Poor TED Talk/podcast is completely inappropriate for assignment; approval was received late or not at all	Fair TED Talk/podcast is not relevant enough to psychology to be appropriate for assignment, even though it may be long enough; approval was received on time	Good TED Talk/podcast is relevant to psychology and appropriate but is not long enough to provide enough substance for assignment; approval was received on time	Excellent TED Talk/podcast is clearly relevant to psychology and is appropriate and long enough for assignment; approval was received on time
Summary 10 pts Quality and accuracy of summary of TED Talk/podcast	Poor Very basic, unclear summary of TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating very little understanding of content and failing to give reader an adequate sense of what TED Talk/podcast was about; many details may be inaccurate or missing	Fair Mostly accurate but more basic summary of TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating some understanding of content and giving reader some sense of what TED Talk/podcast was about; some details may be inaccurate or missing	Good Mostly accurate, mostly detailed summary of TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating good understanding of the content and giving reader a decent sense of what TED Talk/podcast was about; occasional details may be inaccurate or missing	Excellent Accurate, detailed summary of TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the content and giving reader a clear sense of what TEDTalk/podcast was about
Personal Reactions 10 pts Exploration of personal reactions to TED Talk/podcast addressing questions	Poor Very basic, shallow exploration of personal reactions to TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating almost no critical thinking and no depth of analysis; does not address questions	Fair More basic exploration of personal reactions to TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating very little critical thinking and a superficial depth of analysis; only partially addresses questions	Good Satisfactory exploration of personal reactions to TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating at least some critical thinking and a moderate depth of analysis; mostly addresses questions	Excellent Thoughtful, deep exploration of personal reactions to TED Talk/podcast, clearly demonstrating sophisticated critical thinking and clear depth of analysis; fully addresses questions
Personal Applications 10 pts Discussion of personal applications of TED Talk/podcast to own life	Poor Very basic, shallow discussion of personal applications of TED Talk/podcast to own life, demonstrating almost no critical thinking and no depth of analysis	Fair More basic discussion of personal applications of TED Talk/podcast to own life, demonstrating very little critical thinking and a superficial depth of analysis	Good Satisfactory discussion of personal applications of TED Talk/podcast to own life, demonstrating at least some critical thinking and a moderate depth of analysis	Excellent Thoughtful, rich discussion of personal applications of TED Talk/podcast to own life, clearly demonstrating sophisticated critical thinking and clear depth of analysis
Writing 10 points
	Poor Does not meet expectations 1 pts	Fair Partially meets expectations 1.5 pts	Good Mostly meets expectations 2 pts	Excellent Fully meets or exceeds expectations 2.5 pts
Grammar/Writing Mechanics 2.5 pts Did you follow grammar rules and use proper writing mechanics? Did you proofread and avoid typographical errors?	Poor Consistent errors in writing mechanics throughout making paper challenging to read; typographical errors are consistent and detract from readability	Fair Many errors in writing mechanics that detract from understanding; typographical errors are more frequent and detract from readability	Good Occasional errors in writing mechanics that do not detract significantly from understanding; typographical errors are occasional but do not detract from readability	Excellent Almost no errors in grammar or writing mechanics; typographical errors are minimal
Style/Clarity of Writing 2.5 pts Did you use a clear, professional writing style appropriate for a college course? Is your word choice appropriate?	Poor Unprofessional, unclear writing style and frequent poor word choice	Fair Somewhat professional, yet unclear writing style with many issues in appropriate word choice	Good Mostly clear, professional writing style with mostly appropriate word choice throughout	Excellent Clear, professional writing style with appropriate word choice throughout
Focus/Precision of Writing/ 2.5 pts Did you maintain focus on the essay topics? Did you avoid unnecessary information or wordiness?	Poor Lacks clear focus on topics, containing great deal of unnecessary information; unnecessary wordiness is consistent	Fair Acceptable focus but often deviates from topics with unnecessary information; unnecessary wordiness is frequent	Good Mostly clear focus, although some information may deviate from topics; some unnecessary wordiness	Excellent Clear focus on topics throughout with little unnecessary information or wordiness
Organization/Transitions 2.5 pts Are your ideas organized logically? Did you use a logical paragraph structure? Did you use consistent transitions between ideas?	Poor Little organization of ideas and poor paragraph structure; transitions between ideas are absent	Fair Organization of ideas and paragraph structure not always logical; transitions may be lacking	Good Ideas are organized logically overall using mostly logical paragraph structure with transitions between most ideas	Excellent Ideas are organized logically using logical paragraph structure with consistent transitions between ideas

Subjects:

Psychology

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Psychology rubrics

More Writing rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16