Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Venturing into the Media Paper Rubric

iRubric: Venturing into the Media Paper Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Venturing into the Media Paper Rubric Research Paper (Final Draft) - Senior Seminar in LGBTQ Psych This rubric is used to grade the 2-3 page Venturing into the Media paper. (20 points) Rubric Code: PX8ABAC By kevinmatthewfry Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Psychology Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Venturing into the Media Paper
	Poor Does not meet expectations 2 pts	Fair Partially meets expectations 3 pts	Good Mostly meets expectations 4 pts	Excellent Fully meets or exceeds expectations 5 pts
Summary 5 pts Quality and accuracy of summary of TED Talk/podcast	Poor Very basic, unclear summary of TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating very little understanding of content and failing to give reader an adequate sense of what TED Talk/podcast was about; many details may be inaccurate or missing	Fair Mostly accurate but more basic summary of TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating some understanding of content and giving reader some sense of what TED Talk/podcast was about; some details may be inaccurate or missing	Good Mostly accurate, mostly detailed summary of TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating good understanding of the content and giving reader a decent sense of what TED Talk/podcast was about; occasional details may be inaccurate or missing	Excellent Accurate, detailed summary of TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the content and giving reader a clear sense of what TEDTalk/podcast was about
Personal Reactions 5 pts Exploration of personal reactions to TED Talk/podcast addressing required questions	Poor Very basic, shallow exploration of personal reactions to TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating almost no critical thinking and no depth of analysis; does not address the required questions in an acceptably	Fair More basic exploration of personal reactions to TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating very little critical thinking and a superficial depth of analysis; only partially addresses the required questions	Good Satisfactory exploration of personal reactions to TED Talk/podcast, demonstrating at least some critical thinking and a moderate depth of analysis; mostly addresses the required questions	Excellent Thoughtful, deep exploration of personal reactions to TED Talk/podcast, clearly demonstrating sophisticated critical thinking and clear depth of analysis; fully addresses the required questions
Personal Applications 5 pts Discussion of personal applications of TED Talk/podcast to own life	Poor Very basic, shallow discussion of personal applications of TED Talk/podcast to own life, demonstrating almost no critical thinking and no depth of analysis	Fair More basic discussion of personal applications of TED Talk/podcast to own life, demonstrating very little critical thinking and a superficial depth of analysis	Good Satisfactory discussion of personal applications of TED Talk/podcast to own life, demonstrating at least some critical thinking and a moderate depth of analysis	Excellent Thoughtful, rich discussion of personal applications of TED Talk/podcast to own life, clearly demonstrating sophisticated critical thinking and clear depth of analysis
Overall Quality of Writing 5 pts Grammar/mechanics, style/clarity, focus/precision, and organization/transitions	Poor Consistent errors in writing mechanics throughout; unprofessional, unclear writing style and frequent poor word choice; lacks clear focus on topic, containing great deal of unnecessary information; little organization and poor paragraph structure and transitions between ideas are absent	Fair Many errors in writing mechanics that detract from understanding; somewhat professional yet unclear writing style with many issues in appropriate word choice; acceptable focus but often deviates from topic with unnecessary information; organization and paragraph structure not always logical and transitions may be lacking	Good Occasional errors in writing mechanics that do not detract significantly from understanding; mostly clear, professional writing style and appropriate word choice; mostly clear focus, although some information may deviate from topic; organized into mostly logical paragraph structure with transitions between most ideas	Excellent Almost no errors in writing mechanics; clear, professional writing style and appropriate word choice; clear focus on topic throughout with little unnecessary information; organized into logical paragraph structure with transitions between ideas

Subjects:

Psychology

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Psychology rubrics

More Writing rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98