iRubric: Molecular Genetics Research Poster rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Molecular Genetics Research Poster

Students will design a poster centering around the research performed by the top researchers in the molecular genetics field.

Rubric Code: CX53C93

By joanerbug1

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Biology

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title
	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Title	Good Title is extremely descriptive and relevant to the topic of research the researcher's performed and not the researchers themselves.	Fair Title is either partially descriptive, or does not deal with the research topic.	Poor Title is vague and is not pertinent to the topic or the researchers.
Background of Poster	Good Background on poster is creatively designed and relevant to the topic.	Fair Background is not creatively designed, but does reflect the project.	Poor Background is plain or there is no relevancy to the project.
Pictures	Good Pictures are well placed, and are relevant to the topic. All come with a caption describing what the picture is and/or how it is relevant to understanding the research.	Fair Pictures are few and/or are missing captions or are not relevant to topic.	Poor There are little to no pictures and they are not relevant or are missing captions.
Mention of Researcher	Good Researcher's name, dates of life, picture, and place of work are present	Fair Researcher is present, but is missing either their name, date of life, picture or place of work.	Poor Researcher is not present
Sections	Good Sections/subtopics are complete with titles and the titles are very distinct about what is being discussed. All language being used is easy to understand and throughly covered.	Fair Sections/subtopics are not complete with titles, or are very vague. Language is choppy and does not flow well. Topic is not as completely covered as it could be.	Poor There are no sections/subtopics or they are extremely vague.
Mechanics	Good Sentences use appropriate grammar, spelling, and punctuation. There are no errors. All terminology is fully explained and written in the group's own words.	Fair Almost no errors in mechanics, and some terminology is explained and written in the group's own words.	Poor Many errors mechanically and the terminology is not explained or written in the group's own words.
Presentation	Good The presentation was the appropriate length. It did not seem hurried or slow. The presenter spoke clearly and distinctly and all the information was well covered in his/her own words.	Fair The presentation was not the appropriate length or seemed hurried or slow. The presenter spoke clearly most of the time, and most of the information was well covered and in his/her own words.	Poor The presentation was too long or too short, and the presenter did not speak clearly or with confidence about the material.

Subjects:

Biology

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric