iRubric: SOAP Note rubric

3+ mechanical errors (e.g. spelling, syntax, punctuation); Inconcise reporting; Irrelevant punctuality information; Report of information that does not impact performance; Overuse of simple language; Repetitive errors despite the provision of mod-max support.

1-3 mechanical errors; Use of simple language distinctively tied to client/family reporting; Punctuality reporting integrated with performance discussion.

Brief and concise statements; All reports are distinctively related to performance; No mechanical errors.

Inconsistent and incohesive reporting from 'S' and 'O' statements; Minimal evidence of cohesive language; Overuse of simple language with minimal evidence of professional content; Excessive discussion of materials used with limited discussion of skilled service; Excessive use of examples for one or more target objective (i.e. 5+); 5+ mechanical errors; Repetitive errors despite the provision of mod-max support.

Missing comparative data; Evidence of 3-4 types of improper professional terms; Moderate evidence of cohesive language; Follows a clinician-designed template; Vague reporting of client response to intervention.

Clinical implications discussed via conclusions, judgements and interpretations; <5 types of inappropriate use of professional language; Clear, analytical discussion of client response to intervention; Consistent reporting of comparative data; Reported information follows a logical sequence; Concise reporting with ALL relevant qualitative and quantitative information; No new information reported.