iRubric: History Presentation Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

History Presentation Project

History PowerPoint Presentation edited

Students choose a topic, follow the research process and create a presentation which explains the Era you have chosen.

Rubric Code: CAXXAB

By tyedyedtulip

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Aspects 100 %
	Exceptional 10 pts	Excellent 9 pts	Good 8 pts	Satisfactory 7 pts	Poor 6 pts	Unacceptable 5 pts
Knowledge of Material Assigned 20 %	Exceptional Presentation shows group or individual read and understood the assigned material well enough to thoroughly teach about it.	Excellent Presentation shows group or individual read and understood the assigned material well enough to thoroughly teach about it.	Good Presentation shows group read and understood the chapter enough to teach about it.	Satisfactory Presentation shows group read and showed basic understanding.	Poor Presentation shows group skimmed the chapter and did not expand on basic facts.	Unacceptable Presentation shows a skimming of the chapter missing the main topics.
Presentation Method 20 %	Exceptional Presentation is very engaging, entertaining and exciting. It is well written with liberal use of photographs to enhance the information presented.	Excellent Presentation is engaging and entertaining. It is reasonably well written with use of photographs to enhance the information presented.	Good Presentation is somewhat engaging and entertaining. Photographs are used to somewhat enhance the information presented.	Satisfactory Presentation is utilitarian. There are photographs used but are ineffectual or there is no photographs used.	Poor Presentation is adequate. Photographs, if any, are inappropriate or ineffectual and detract from the information presented. .	Unacceptable Presentation is inadequate. Photographs, if any, are inappropriate or ineffectual and detract from the information presented. Background is inappropriate for the presentation.
Organization 20 % Structure of the PowerPoint	Exceptional Content is written clearly and concisely with a logical sequence of ideas and supporting information. The presentation gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.	Excellent Content is written with a logical sequence of ideas and supporting information. Most of the presentation gives the audience an idea of the topic.	Good The content is vague in certain aspects or missing them all together. Main points may be lost to the audience. Includes few facts. Some of the information may not seem to fit.	Satisfactory Sequencing of ideas is unclear. Includes little information - few facts from each topic. Information is incomplete or incorrect.	Poor Too many or too few facts Information is incomplete. Few facts are present in general. The main ideas are difficult to ascertain or non evident.	Unacceptable Students did not present the correct content. It is difficult to learn any of the historical information assigned from the presentation.
Oral Presentation 20 %	Exceptional Poised, clear articulation; proper volume and rate; eye contact. Points made in creative way. Every group member speaks frequently.	Excellent Poised, clear articulation; proper volume and rate; eye contact; points made in creative way. Every group member speaks frequently.	Good Some mumbling; some eye contact; uneven rate; little expression. Held the audience's attention most of the time. Every group member speaks.	Satisfactory Inaudible or too loud; no eye contact; rate too slow/fast. Lost the audience's interest; mostly presented facts with little or no imagination. Most group members speak.	Poor Unprepared and unrehearsed oral expositions are given. Volume and/or rate may be off. Speakers fail to engage the audience. Only one or two group members speak.	Unacceptable One group member talked the whole time and did a poor job at engaging the class.
Historical Accuracy 20 %	Exceptional Virtually error-free; minor mistakes do not compromise argument.	Excellent There are historical errors minor in nature which do not compromise argument	Good Includes errors; errors insignificantly compromise argument.	Satisfactory General, largely accurate data, but contains major errors or misstatements.	Poor Writing has extremely high error rate; totally unsubstantiated by historical fact.	Unacceptable Extremely inaccurate

Keywords:

American History Project

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric