iRubric: Literary Analysis Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Literary Analysis Presentation

Based on Breath, Eyes, Memory

Rubric Code: C2WX998

By awarren7424

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Literary Analysis Presentation
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Organization	Excellent •Students present a sophisticated, logical, and interesting organizational sequence which audience can easily follow.	Good •Students develop logical sequence which audience can follow.	Fair •Pattern is vague and ill-conceived; lacks clear structure, making it hard for the audience to follow	Poor •Student does not address pattern or the pattern is illogical
Delivery	Excellent •Students maintain eye contact with audience and clear, correct, precise pronunciation of terms is used so that all audience members can hear presentation. •Student is very enthusiastic and fluid. Presentation demonstrates mastery of grammar, usage, mechanics and spelling.	Good •Students maintain eye contact most of the time and voice are clear. •Student pronounces most words correctly. •Most audience members can hear presentation. Student creates a fluid presentation. •Presentation demonstrates control of grammar, usage, mechanics and spelling.	Fair •Students occasionally use eye contact and voices are low. •Students incorrectly pronounce or seem unfamiliar with terms. •Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. •Students are somewhat fluid in presentation. •Presentation contains some intrusive errors in grammar, usage, mechanics and spelling.	Poor •Students present information with no eye contact. •Students mumble, incorrectly pronounces or use terms, and speak too quietly for students in the back of class to hear. •Body language is too distracting. •Presentation contains frequent, severe errors in grammar, usage, mechanics and spelling.
Analysis/Meaning	Excellent • Analysis offers insightful discussion of theme development within the text. Go well beyond observation, and includes an analytical perspective.	Good • Analysis offers accurate interpretation of the development of the theme within the text and go beyond observation, to include analytical perspective.	Fair • Analysis conveys a partly accurate understanding of the text and theme and offer few or superficial interpretations and/or explanations of theme development. May have a tendency to simply retell.	Poor • Analysis convey a confused or largely inaccurate understanding of the text and/or theme development; explanations and Interpretations are often unclear.
Content	Excellent • Information shows expertise in textual understanding, use of literary terms, and in establishing context within the passage and in the text as a whole. • The analysis demonstrates a clear, complete understanding of the assignment and literature selection. • The analysis demonstrates a very clear purpose and focus. • Analysis seamlessly includes a synopsis of the literature selection.	Good •Students give accurate and sufficient information with attention to context and has solid understanding of literary terms. • A good understanding of the assignment and literature selection is demonstrated. • The analysis demonstrates a clear purpose and focus. • Analysis includes a synopsis of the literature selection. • Presentation shows an understanding of elements of literary analysis.	Fair •Students give mostly accurate and sufficient information, with some attention to context • The analysis demonstrates some but incomplete understanding of the assignment and/or literary analysis. • An incomplete understanding of the literature selection is demonstrated. • The analysis has an unstated purpose and focus. • Analysis includes an incomplete/inaccurate synopsis of the selection. • Few ideas and arguments	Poor •Student gives inaccurate or insufficient information and student fails to address context. • An incomplete and sometimes inaccurate understanding of the literature selection and/or the assignment is demonstrated. • No purpose and focus are presented. • Analysis may not include a synopsis of the literature selection. • Presentation shows little or an inaccurate understanding of literary analysis.
Use of Evidence	Excellent •Students use textual evidence to support well-developed claims/ideas. •Evidence is substantial and has direct correlation to claim. •Evidence is correctly cited.	Good •Students use textual evidence to support ideas/claims. •Correlation may be difficult to follow at times, but attempt to create link is evident.	Fair •Students give broad ideas with some textual evident; textual evidence may be misused. • Examples from the work of literature are quoted without a clear connection to the focus of the analysis.	Poor •Students give broad ideas with no textual evidence or evidence doesn't correlate with ideas. •Examples from the work of literature are not cited.

Keywords:

Presentation

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric