iRubric: The War of The Worlds Alternative Assessment Group Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

The War of The Worlds Alternative Assessment Group Rubric

This rubric is designed to assess the presentation of the group activity. The rubric should consider the performance of the group as a whole, as well as individual contributions.

Rubric Code: C27BX8

By johnchg

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: (none)

Group Presentation Rubric
	Excellent 50 pts	Good 40 pts	Fair 30 pts	Poor 20 pts	Incomplete 0 pts
Organization	Excellent Presentation was very organized and was very easy to follow. Transitions between group members were well planned and executed cleanly.	Good Presentation was fairly organized and pretty followable. Transitions might have been slightly discontinuous but did not take away geatly from the overall presentation.	Fair Presentation was not clearly organized. Transitions between members were jumpy or awkward.	Poor Presentation lacked organization. Poor transitions between group members individual parts. Presentation lacked order and very difficult to follow.	Incomplete Extension granted.
Content	Excellent Group members had a stronghold on the theme of the text and content related theme to local issues, population and made connection between text and self.	Good The group members had a solid understanding of the text theme and made a connection to either local issues and population or self.Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors.	Fair Group members had only a superficial understanding of theme. Several ommissions of relevant local information were made during the presentation.	Poor Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation.	Incomplete Extension granted.
Teamwork/Participation	Excellent The group worked very well with each other and the presentation was shared equally among the group members.	Good The group worked well with each other and communicated well. Some members participated slightly more than others.	Fair Group communicated relatively well with a few lapses in the presentation; some students dominated the presentation and others did not participate much.	Poor Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications and lapses in the presentation.	Incomplete Extension granted.
Multimedia Aid(s) Visual, sound, technology driven effects.	Excellent Multimedia aids used were used effectively throughout presentation. Group members used visual aids as a supplement, not as a crutch.	Good Multimedia aids used were somewhat effective, but weren't used consistently thoughout presentation.	Fair Multimedia aids used did not support verbal presentation. They lacked information, or groups members read from them.	Poor Multimedia aids were not used at all.	Incomplete Extension granted.