Skip to main content
iRubric: Social Justice Comprehensive Project Rubric

iRubric: Social Justice Comprehensive Project Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Social Justice Comprehensive Project Rubric 
Social Justice Comprehensive Project Rubric
This is the rubric for assessing the Social Justice Project
Rubric Code: AXW393B
By sbtaylor
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Social Justice Project A
This rubric will asses the content of the Social Justice Powerpoint presentation.
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

9 pts

Average

8 pts

Fair

7 pts

Poor

5 pts

Understanding of Church Teaching

Students will show knowledge of what the Church teaches on their SJ issue
Excellent

The Church's teaching on this issue is accurate and carefully crafted in the presentation to enable the viewer to thoroughly understand the Church's view.
Good

The Church's teaching on this issue is accurate and provides a context that enables the viewer to understand the Church's view.
Average

The Church's teaching on this issue is unclear in the presentation which leaves the viewer with a basic understanding of the Church's stance.
Fair

The Church's teaching on this issue is inaccurate or vague, and does not establish a context for the viewer to understand the Church's teaching.
Poor

The Church's teaching on this issue is inaccurate or non-existant which leaves the viewer with a misunderstanding of the Church's teaching.
Magnitude of the SJ Problem

Through statistics and analysis, students will show they comprehend what is the problem at the heart of this SJ issue.
Excellent

There is extensive evidence of statistics gathered and the analysis makes meaningful connections between between the statistics and the heart of the problem.
Good

There is evidence of research conducted. The statistics presented make relevant connections between how the statistics affect the problem.
Average

There are statistics offered. The research presented is limited and does not make relevant connections between the statistics and the problem.
Fair

The statistics offered are not relevant to the problem and are randomly provided with no connection offered.
Poor

There is faulty or missing evidence of statistics in the presentation.
Scripture

Presentation provides 3 scripture references to the topic and reflects how they apply
Excellent

Presentation includes all 3 scripture references and clearly analyzes how or why they apply to the issue.
Good

Presentation includes 3 scripture references and attempts to explain how they apply, but only shows more of a connection, no analysis.
Average

Presentation includes 2-3 scripture references and does not clearly explain each ones connection to the issue.
Fair

Presentation includes 1-2 scripture references with little to no explanation of their relevance.
Poor

There are no scripture passages included in the presenation.
Principles of CST

Presentation reveals all of the principles of CST that are violated with this issue and analyzes them
Excellent

The presentation analyzed how all of the principles of CST applied and are violated by this injustice in society.
Good

The presentation connected the principles of CST to the issue by just discussing them - connecting them in a slide without really analyzing
Average

The presentation named some of the principles connected to the issue, but not all and connected them to the injustice of their issue.
Fair

The presentation named some of the principles connected to the issue without connecting them to the heart of the problem
Poor

The presentation made no mention of the themes of CST in the presentation.
Social Justice Champion

Students will highlight an individual working on this issue in society and how they are helping to solve the problem.
Excellent

This section includes many relevant details outlining the person's path of service and the achievements they have had. Section also includes reference to the contribution made to society.
Good

This section includes information outlining the person's path of service and the achievements they have had. Section also includes some reference to the contribution made to society.
Average

This section includes details about the person and the service done. Their achievements are vague as well as the reference to the contribution made to society.
Fair

This section includes very little detail outlining the person's path of service and the achievements they have had. Section does not clearly reference the contribution made to society.
Poor

This section does not includes relevant details about the person or their contribution made to society.
Group Service Project

Students will reveal how they "lived the truth in love" to help alleviate the problem concerning this issue.
Excellent

Group reflected relevant details of their service and clearly outlined how the service done was connected to the problem through justice or charity.
Good

Group provided details of their service and outlined how the service done was connected to the problem through justice or charity.
Average

Group reflected some details of their service but was unable to clearly establish how the service was connected to the problem.
Fair

Group discussed service but made no attempt at analyzing its connection to their problem.
Poor

Service was not completed or addressed in the presentation.
Class Activity

Students came up with an activity for the class to break open or process the injustice they are presenting.
Excellent

Group shows outstanding creative ability in that the activity effectively breaks open the issue and is connected to inspiring a response in the viewer about the heart of the matter.
Good

Group shows creative ability in that the activity sums up the issue and is connected to inspiring some response in the viewer about the heart of the matter.
Average

Group adequately sums up the issue, with average creativity that makes some connection to the heart of the matter.
Fair

Group is not very creative in their activity and/or it seems a random attachment to the presentation.
Poor

There is no creative activity provided with the presentation or the response is disconnected from the main points of the presentation.



Keywords:
  • Social Justice Rubric


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98