- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: The Most Awesome Invertebrate rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
The Most Awesome Invertebrate Microsoft Word Project: Flyer This rubric is used to assess a Microsoft Word Flyer Project. Please create a flyer to convince the class you have the most awesome invertebrate. Rubric Code: AXC77CW By jnadeau Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Biology Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Digital Flyer Presentation
	1 pts	0.8 pts	0.6 pts	0.4 pts
Required Elements	1 All the requirements were met: 1. Title of the World's Most Awesome Invertebrate. 2. Name of Invertebrate. 3. Phylum of Invertebrate. 4. One or more special Characteristics.	0.8 3 of the 4 requirements were met.	0.6 2 of the 4 requirements were met.	0.4 1 of the 4 requirements were met. Project is unacceptable.
Design/Artistry	1 The project contains excellent formatting, was easy to read, and was aesthetically pleasing. The descriptions were listed with bullet points.	0.8 One of the following could be improved upon: formatting, readability, or aesthetics.	0.6 Two of the following could be improved upon: formatting, readability, or aesthetics	0.4 The project is not formatted, difficult to read, and not visually appealing. No bullet points.
Pictures/Videos	1 Pictures are included with the project. There are 2 video links that are less than 2 minutes long.	0.8 Pictures are included in the project. Only one video was present.	0.6 Videos do not illustrate the views of the organism.	0.4 There were no pictures or videos present.
Time/ Voting	1 Students addressed the organism for 2 minutes. Students had 2 videos that were 2 minutes or less. Students voted for the most awesome invertebrate.	0.8 Students exceeded the 6 minute time limit. Students voted.	0.6 Students did not meet the time requirement or did not vote.	0.4 Student did not meet the time requirement and did not vote for the most awesome invertebrate.
Scientific Accuracy	1 Organism was scientifically accurate, displaying the organisms unique features to its phylum.	0.8 Organism was scientifically accurate, but the unique features to the phylum were not addressed.	0.6 Organism was not scientifically accurate or the phylum was not listed.	0.4 Organism was not accurate and the phylum was not listed.