iRubric: Reflection Paper - Journals - Orgnizational Behavior rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Reflection Paper - Journals - Orgnizational Behavior

Reflection

Students are expected to reflect on the different approaches to English Language Teaching (ELT).

Rubric Code: A2WW4WX

By cjanderson47

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Reflection

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Reflection paper rubric
	EXCELLENT 10 pts	GOOD 9 pts	FAIR 8 pts	WEAK 7 pts	ACCEPTABLE 6 pts
Organization & Mechanics	EXCELLENT Writing is fluent and interesting to read. Discussion is backed up with evidence from the approach/method introduced. Response is to the point, in complete sentences, free of spelling errors and uses correct grammar.	GOOD Writing is fluent and mostly interesting; discussion could be supported more strongly, spelling errors are minimal and grammar is mostly accurate.	FAIR Minimal details from the approach/method included. Conclusion or an opinion is not clear. Writing is not interesting.	WEAK Missing one or more of the following: details from the approach/method introduced, opinion.	ACCEPTABLE
Ideas & Content	EXCELLENT Information is accurate and response shows good insight of the approach/method introduced. The response is complete. Discussion makes a logical conclusion or an opinion is offered.	GOOD Information is accurate. Discussion makes a logical conclusion or an opinion is offered. Missing an insightful analysis of the approach/method.	FAIR Information provided is generally accurate but no insight or analysis is offered.	WEAK Information is not accurate. Not insight, analysis or opinion is offered.	ACCEPTABLE
Reflection	EXCELLENT The response is very specific. Many of the techniques favoured/disfavoured are clearly supported with details/evidence.	GOOD The response is somewhat specific. Some of the techniques favoured/disfavoured are clearly supported.	FAIR The response is not related to the approach/method introduced. The favoured/disfavoured techniques are not clearly supported.	WEAK There is no response to the favoured/disfavoured techniques. Writing is completely off-topic.	ACCEPTABLE