Skip to main content
iRubric: Analyzing Misleading Marketing Claims rubric

iRubric: Analyzing Misleading Marketing Claims rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Analyzing Misleading Marketing Claims 
Through this project, students will gain a deeper understanding of food labels and sustainable claims while developing critical thinking skills necessary to navigate the complexities of the food industry as informed consumers. Students will be able to assess their understanding and proficiency in deciphering misleading marketing tactics and making informed choices about the food they consume.
Rubric Code: A247A66
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Analyzing Misleading Marketing Claims
  Insufficient

5 pts

Sufficient

10 pts

Proficient

15 pts

Accomplished

20 pts

Food Label Analysis

Insufficient

Limited understanding of food labels and their significance.Provides a superficial critique of misleading marketing claims, lacking depth or specificity.
Sufficient

Basic understanding of food labels but lacks depth in analysis. Offers a basic critique of misleading marketing claims, identifying some flaws or inconsistencies but lacks comprehensive analysis.
Proficient

Demonstrates a clear understanding of food labels and effectively analyzes their components. Conducts a thorough critique of misleading marketing claims, identifying multiple flaws, inconsistencies, or ethical concerns; provides evidence-based arguments to support critique.
Accomplished

Provides thorough analysis of food labels, identifying misleading marketing tactics and offering insightful interpretations. Delivers an insightful and nuanced critique of misleading marketing claims, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of the complexities and implications; offers constructive suggestions for addressing or mitigating the impact of such claims on consumers and the food industry.
Research & Data Collection

Insufficient

Limited or inadequate research methods are employed; sources are unreliable or insufficiently diverse. Data analysis is absent or lacks clarity; limited understanding of statistical techniques or relevance to research objectives.
Sufficient

Research methods are employed, but sources lack diversity or reliability; limited quantity or relevance of data collected. Conducts basic data analysis, but lacks depth or coherence in interpretation; limited use of statistical techniques to draw meaningful conclusions.
Proficient

Demonstrates thorough research methods, utilizing diverse and reliable sources; sufficient quantity and relevance of data collected to support research objectives. Conducts thorough data analysis, utilizing appropriate statistical techniques to identify patterns, trends, and correlations; effectively interprets data findings in relation to research objectives.
Accomplished

Implements comprehensive and rigorous research methods, utilizing a wide range of diverse and reliable sources; abundant quantity of relevant data collected, enhancing the depth and validity of research findings.
Opposing Viewpoint

Insufficient

Fails to acknowledge or consider opposing viewpoints related to misleading marketing claims in the food industry.
Sufficient

Briefly acknowledges opposing viewpoints but lacks depth in analysis or consideration of alternative perspectives.
Proficient

Adequately addresses opposing viewpoints, demonstrating understanding and empathy towards different perspectives; integrates opposing arguments into the discussion to provide a balanced view.
Accomplished

Thoroughly examines opposing viewpoints, engaging in critical analysis and thoughtful reflection on alternative perspectives; presents counterarguments effectively to strengthen the overall argument and understanding of the topic.
Presentation

Insufficient

Presentation lacks organization and fails to effectively communicate key points.
Sufficient

Presents information adequately but lacks engagement and creativity.
Proficient

Presents information clearly and concisely, engaging the audience with relevant visuals and examples.
Accomplished

Delivers an engaging and informative presentation that effectively conveys the importance of understanding food labels and sustainable claims.
Infographic

Insufficient

The infographic is cluttered or has too many blank spaces, and it is difficult to understand.
Sufficient

The infographic provides basic information but lacks visual appeal and clarity.
Proficient

The infographic is visually appealing and effectively communicates key points about food labels and sustainable claims.
Accomplished

The infographic is visually stunning and conveys information clearly and concisely, serving as a valuable resource for consumers.
Commericial Video

Insufficient

The video contains fewer than two claims about the rhetorical techniques used in marketing. The video does not communicate the rhetorical purpose or consumerism critique. The video does not effectively use audio, video, text, graphics, and Works Cited page.
Sufficient

The video contains three claims about the rhetorical techniques used in marketing. The presentation has inconsistent rhetorical analysis and critique.The video does not effectively use audio, video, text, graphics, and Works Cited page.
Proficient

The video contains four claims about the rhetorical techniques used in marketing. The presentation maintains an adequate rhetorical analysis and the effectiveness of the critique.The video does not effectively use audio, video, text, graphics, and Works Cited page.
Accomplished

The video contains five or more claims about the rhetorical techniques used in marketing. The presentation adds to the rhetorical analysis and effectiveness of the critique. The video does not effectively use audio, video, text, graphics, and Works Cited page.
Professionalism

Insufficient

Lacks professionalism in developing tone and language. Fails to convey a sense of competence or reliability.
Sufficient

Language and tone are somewhat professional. There may be occasional lapses or inconsistencies.
Proficient

Language and tone are consistently professional, conveying competence, and credibility.
Accomplished

Exemplifies the highest standards of professionalism, reflecting meticulous attention to detail, accuracy, and clarity.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16