Skip to main content
iRubric: Band PERFORMANCE assessment rubric

iRubric: Band PERFORMANCE assessment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Band PERFORMANCE assessment 
Solo and Performance Assessment
Demonstrate progress of musicianship, technique, vocabulary and performance improvement.
Rubric Code: X2X742C
By lynnerslmk
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Band Progress Assessment
Student Perform
  Poor

1 pts

Below Average

2 pts

Average

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellence

5 pts

Rhythm Accuracy

Does the performance align with written tempos and MP3/Metronome of performance
Poor

No evidence of steady pulse. Musician does not line up with metronome/MP3
Below Average

Pulse is unstable with major rhythmic errors.
Average

Pulse is fairly steady but there are repeated small rhythmic errors.
Good

Steady pulse with few rhythmic errors.
Excellence

Steady pulse with accurate rhythms at all times and flawlessly lines up with metronome/MP3
Note Accuracy

Does the musician play the correct notes written
Poor

No recognizable tune is present.
Below Average

Many notes are incorrect - student seems unfamiliar with the tune.
Average

Shows a good feel for the notes but with repeated small mistakes in pitch.
Good

Mostly correct with a few errors. There may be small intonation problems.
Excellence

Pitches are correct and intonation has a characteristic quality sound in all registers.
Tone Quality

Evaluation of tone quality and characterstic instrumental sound
Poor

Sound is totally lacking in quality due to a poorly formed or weak embouchure/grip and no breath support.
Below Average

Limited projection - tone is poor & range is limited because of weak embouchure and little breath support.
Average

Fair use of projection and fullness of tone. There is room for improvement in posture, embouchure<BR>
& breath support.
Good

Considerable use of projection and fullness of tone but still somewhat short of a mature sound.
Excellence

Tone is full and well projected. A truly characteristic sound for the instrument.
Musicality

Are there obvious phrases with demonstrated layers of dynamics
Poor

Student Does not give attention to dynamics, articulations, phrasing, or style indications.
Below Average

Rarely uses dynamics, articulations & phrasing or follows indications of style.
Average

Student displays inconsistant use of dynamics, articulation, phrasing & style.
Good

Student displays ability to play with correct dynamics, articulation, phrasing & style with minor errors.
Excellence

Student consistently plays with appropriate dynamics, articulation, phrasing & style.
Visual

Does the performer demonstrate mastery of marching posture/breathing and mark time technique
Poor

Performer did not stand/show any marching posture. Performer sat
Below Average

Performer shows a lack of understanding of marching technique and posture
Average

Performer stood but showed average technique with a lack of understanding of mark time and posture.
Good

Performer showed good marching technique/posture but did not add any visuals or horn moves
Excellence

Performer showed a mastery of marching technique/posture AND added visuals with creativity and enthusiasm. Horn moves were obvious and strong.
Video Quality

What has the performer recorded
Poor

Camera is not in landscape/horizontal position
Below Average

Most of performer is not showing and is unable to be evaluated.
Average

Most of performer is not visible and all of performance is not able to be evaluated. Sound is not of great quality and cannot be heard
Good

Performer is not completely visible or feet are not shown. Camera is landscape but parts of performance are not seen
Excellence

Performer is visual in entirety and all footwork is easy to see. Camera is filmed in horizontal landscape position and performer is clearly seen.
Accompaniment

Poor

Student had no accompaniment with their performance
Below Average

Student had accompaniment but there was a clear lack of preparation associated with it.
Average

Student had accompaniment and attention was made to play together, but there were major flaws in the end result.
Good

Student had accompaniment and attention was made to play together, There were minor flaws in the end result but did not take away from the overall performance.
Excellence

Student had accompaniment and great attention was made to associate the performances, The recording was professional and a pleasure to listen.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16