Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Climate change video rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Climate change video
Documentary - Science
you will create a documnetary on the subject of your choice to teach the class key points about the subject. The documentary must be a minimum of 4 minutes and a workcited sheet will be required.
Rubric Code:
VXC4CB2
By
Jack1918
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Documentary
Poor
0 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Message
1 pts
Poor
Message is not clear or is not stated within the first minute
Fair
Message is clear within the first minute or is somewhat vague
Good
Message is presented within the first 30 seconds but is somewhat vague
Excellent
Message is clear and obvious within the first 30 seconds
Climate change information
4 pts
Poor
Both items are plagiarized or are missing
Fair
Both items are addressed yet are poorly presented or vague or 1 item is completely missing
Good
Climate changed is defined, yet could have been more clearly stated OR why it is misunderstood is vague
(One item is acceptable, the other needs improvement)
Excellent
Climate change is clearly and accurately defined in laymen’s terms and an accurate description of why it is misunderstood is simply and clearly stated.
Climate indicators
4 pts
Poor
No climate change indicators are addressed or indicator information is plagiarized
Fair
Climate change indicators are presented in a disorganized or confusing way; language is beyond laymen level or less than half are included
Good
All 6 climate change indicators are mentioned but some may be wordy, or vague
Excellent
All 6 Climate changed indicators used by the EPA are briefly and completely addressed
Using laymen’s terms
Climate change result
4 pts
Poor
No result is clear or is plagiarized
Fair
Result is mentioned but not referred to continuously through the video or very underdeveloped
Good
The result is clear yet underdeveloped.
Excellent
A climate change result is focused on through the video. The result is clear and well defined
Action
1 pts
Poor
No action is stated or action is plagiarized
Fair
Action is stated but is vague
Good
Action is stated but not applicable to the viewer
Excellent
Action is clearly stated with conviction and is appropriate for the audience
Documentary Characteristics
2 pts
Poor
- form is not true to the documentary characteristics discussed in class
Fair
- form is somewhat true to the documentary characteristics discussed in class
Good
- form is true to the documentary characteristics discussed in class (i.e. narration, interview, educational, informative, etc)
Excellent
- form is true to the documentary characteristics discussed in class
- new ideas and forms are introduced
Creativity
2 pts
Poor
- there is little evidence of creativity such as unique ideas, personality, humour, original ideas, entertaining presentation
Fair
- there is some evidence of creativity such as unique ideas, personality, humour, original ideas, entertaining presentation
Good
- there is evidence of creativity such as unique ideas, personality, humour, original ideas, entertaining presentation
Excellent
- there is ample evidence of creativity such as unique ideas, personality, humour, original ideas, entertaining presentation
Polished Presentation
2 pts
Poor
- there is little evidence the work has been edited
- students made little use of technology available
- the presentation rarely flows; it is rough and pieced together
Fair
- there is some evidence the work has been edited
- students made some use of technology available
- the presentation flows some of the time, but is rough and pieced together
Good
- there is evidence that the work has been edited
- students made use of technology available
- the presentation flows
Excellent
- there is ample evidence that the work has been edited
- students made effective use of technology available
- the presentation flows
Work Cited Page
1 pts
Poor
None Given
Fair
Present but not in proper format and many sources missing.
Good
Present and in proper format, but some sources missing.
Excellent
Present and in proper format. All sources cited.
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.