Skip to main content
  • help_outline help
iRubric: discussion board rubric

iRubric: discussion board rubric

 
find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   apply to...   delete   Do more...
discussion board 
for online communication class
Rubric Code: V28B54
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate


Powered by iRubric Online Discussion Board
Every week 5 points are avaibable to students that particiopate in the online discussion board
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Contributes to Class
1 pts

Contributes to the online discussion, using the weeks readings, outside observations, and personal experince.

Excellent

Posting is insightful, thorough and interesting.
Good

Posting is thorough and interesting.
Fair

Posting is interesting but lacks insight and depth.
Poor

Posting is uninteresting and/or too brief for the assignments.
Demonstrates Understanding
2 pts

Excellent

Posting demonstrates understanding of selected topic through exploration of the literature and evidences critical evaluation of the selected topic that is substantiated by evidence based literature from a current professional journal and accurate information from a professional website.
Good

Posting demonstrates a basic understanding of the selected topic that is supported by information from a current professional journal and accurate information from a professional website
Fair

Posting demonstrates understanding of the reading assignment but is not substantiated by examples from the textbook and/or appropriate website.
Poor

Posting demonstrates very little understanding of the reading assignment.
Provides Substantive Responses
1 pts

Excellent

Actively engaged in the discussion forums with at least two (2) postings of other students in a manner that demonstrates substantive analysis and/or evaluation.
Good

Actively engaged in the discussion forum with at least two (2) postings of other students where one (1) of the postings demonstrates substantive analysis and/or evaluation while second demonstrates constructive analysis but is not of the same quality as required for an excellent rating.
Fair

Makes at least two (2) responses but responses fail to constructively
demonstrate analysis or are inadequate.
Poor

Less than acceptable responses
(.2)

Does not respond or responses are not related to the topic
(0)
Utilizes Correct Grammar, Mechanics
1 pts

Excellent

Posting is polished generally free of errors in mechanics, spelling, usage and sentence structure.
Good

Posting is polished but may contain minor errors in mechanics, spelling, usage and sentence structure.
Fair

Posting is adequate but may contain some errors in mechanics, spelling, usage and sentence structure but errors do not interfere with understanding.
Poor

Posting has numerous errors in mechanics, usage, spelling and sentence structure. Errors interfere with the readability.



Keywords:
  • small group communication


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2020 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n17