Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Synthesis rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Synthesis
G/T Research FINAL Synthesis Paper
Rubric Code:
UX3AC23
By
PLLC2015
Ready to use
Private Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Synthesis
4/Superior
40 pts
3/Proficient
30 pts
2/Adequate
20 pts
1/Insufficient
10 pts
Fail
0 pts
Integration of Knowledge
30 %
4/Superior
The author demonstrates full understanding and has applied concepts learned through the module. The author makes strong connections between different online activities. Knowledge from the module is integrated into the writer's own original insights. Author cites required number of sources.
3/Proficient
The author demonstrates general understanding and has applied general concepts learned from the module. The author makes connections between different online activities. Some connections/insights are integrated into the writer's own original insights. Author cites required number of sources.
2/Adequate
The author demonstrates basic to cursory understanding and has superficially applied concepts learned from the module. Some connections/insights are not fully supported. Little to no original insight. Author cites required number of sources.
1/Insufficient
The author does not demonstrate basic understanding nor has applied concepts learned in the module. Author summarizes but does not include original thought. Author does not cite required number of sources.
Fail
Author confuses/misrepresents/fails to understand module content. Author does not cite required number of sources
Focus
20 %
4/Superior
The synthesis is focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment. An original thesis statement provides direction for the paper either with a statement of a position or guiding question.
3/Proficient
The synthesis is focused but lacks direction. The synthesis has a thesis statement or guiding question, but it is unoriginal.
2/Adequate
The synthesis has a thesis statement or guiding question, but it is broad and unoriginal.
1/Insufficient
The synthesis lacks a thesis statement or guiding question.
Fail
The synthesis has no focus and is impossible to follow.
Quality of Writing
20 %
4/Superior
Writing is smooth, skillful, and coherent, fully engaging the reader. Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure. Consistent and appropriate tone and word choice is used throughout the essay.
3/Proficient
Writing is clear and sentences have varied structure. There is consistent tone and word choice is appropriate.
2/Adequate
Writing is clear, but sentences lack variety. The tone is inconsistent and word choice, while adequate, does not clearly explain the process.
1/Insufficient
Writing is confusing and hard to follow. Writing contains fragments and/or run-on sentences. The tone is inconsistent and word choice is inadequate/confusing.
Fail
Writing makes synthesis very difficult to understand.
Inappropriate tone is used.
Writing contains fragments and/or run-on sentences.
Cohesiveness
10 %
4/Superior
Synthesis flows from one issue to the next with smooth transitions. Writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship between sources.
3/Proficient
Synthesis flows with adequate transitions. Writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship between these sources.
2/Adequate
Synthesis does not flow; disjointedness is apparent. Transitions are there, but weak. Writing does not demonstrate full understanding of the relationship between sources.
1/Insufficient
Synthesis does not flow and there are no transitions. Writing does not demonstrate full understanding of the relationship between sources.
Fail
Synthesis is disjointed and ignores relationships between sources.
Overall
10 %
4/Superior
Synthesis fully engaged reader and left reader thinking, expanding the reader's understanding of the topic. Reader is able to summarize the synthesis. Synthesis furthered the reader's interest in the topic.
3/Proficient
Synthesis left reader thinking and expanded the reader's understanding of the topic. Reader is able to summarize the synthesis. Synthesis furthered the reader's interest in the topic.
2/Adequate
Synthesis expanded the reader's understanding of the topic. Reader is able to summarize the synthesis. Synthesis did not further reader's interest in the topic.
1/Insufficient
Synthesis left reader confused and/or frustrated. Synthesis did not spark the reader's interest in the topic, or further understanding of the topic.
Fail
Synthesis left reader frustrated and confused. Synthesis used problematic language/made problematic statements that need follow up from Teaching Fellow
Spelling & Grammar
5 %
4/Superior
No spelling or grammar mistakes.
3/Proficient
Minimal spelling or grammar mistakes.
2/Adequate
Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes.
1/Insufficient
Unacceptable number of spelling and grammar mistakes.
Fail
Spelling/grammar makes synthesis very difficult to understand.
Citations in APA format
5 %
4/Superior
Accurately cites all sources. In-text citations and bibliography strictly adhere to APA format.
3/Proficient
Cites all sources. In-text citations and bibliography generally adhere to APA format.
2/Adequate
Cites all sources. In-text citations and bibliography somewhat adhere to APA format inconsistently or incorrectly.
1/Insufficient
Not all sources are cited. Most sources are not cited in APA format; bibliography does not adhere to APA style.
Fail
Most sources are not cited. Sources that are cited are not cited in APA format; bibliography is absent and/or does not adhere to APA style.
Subjects:
Humanities
(General)
Types:
Assessment
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Humanities rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Add to Gallery
Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.