Skip to main content
iRubric: Rubric Analytical Philosophical Inquiry

iRubric: Rubric Analytical Philosophical Inquiry

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rubric Analytical Philosophical Inquiry 
communication/persuasive argument development. You must cite at least three examples or quotes as evidence and explain why they are relevant to your thesis.
Rubric Code: TXC35XA
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Philosophy  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Analytical Philosophical Inquiry
  Master

4 pts

Approaching Expert

3 pts

Apprentice

2 pts

Trying Hard!

1 pts

Claim

Master

The claim is clearly discernible and it is stated along with three logical reasons as part of overview. The argument is sound and consistently supported with well-chosen evidence from the particular theorist.
Approaching Expert

The claim takes a clear position. Argument and evidence may at times be strained. One support paragraph may veer off topic, or examples from the particular theorist may be lacking.
Apprentice

The claim is weak, wordy, and/or garbled. The main
argument and/or evidence is weak or does not always support the claim. Supporting pars. may veer off topic.
Trying Hard!

No claim. Argument and evidence do not connect or support one point. All
supporting paragraphs are disconnected.
Organization

Master

Essay is focused and organized by design. Clearly demonstrates the application of and conclusion derived from each of the three criteria.
Pars. have clear topic/concluding sentences; body paragraphs include counterarguments with refutation & effective transitions.
Approaching Expert

Essay is organized.
Has a topic and concluding sentences; body paragraphs may include counterarguments and refutation, or not; and/or lack transitions; and/or lack an overall design. Infers the application of and conclusion derived from the three criteria.
Apprentice

Some confusion due to lack of organization. Has weak topic and/or concluding sentence; and body paragraphs include weak counterargument and ineffective rebuttal. Transitions are weak or absent. Allusion to the criteria but lacks direct application and conclusion.
Trying Hard!

No organization.No apparent topic is present, and/or concluding sentence is missing; body paragraphs lack counterarguments and/or rebuttal. No transitions. Topical or trite mention of the criteria. Discursive.
Analysis

Master

Claim is fully developed and supported by research emanating from case study. Evidence is vivid and relevant. Analysis shows insightful reflection with highly effective use of persuasive strategies.
Approaching Expert

Claim is well developed and supported with good evidence. Analysis shows understanding with some use of persuasive strategies. Information that is relevant pertaining to case study.
Apprentice

Claim is not well supported by evidence. Analysis is partly understood and demonstrated; inconsistent persuasive strategies.Allusion to case study
Trying Hard!

Claim is not supported by evidence or analysis. Case study hardly mentioned and no expository research evident.
Voice & Tone

Master

Consistently uses a variety in word choice and sentence structure.
Strong unique voice adds polished style to the writing; tone is consistent with purpose throughout.
Approaching Expert

Shows some variety in word choice and/or sentence structure.
Uses own voice, but style may be rough. Tone is consistent with purpose, but may include one or two abrupt shifts
Apprentice

Not enough variety in sentence structure and/or word choice.
Voice and tone are well suited, but do not stand out or are highly inconsistent.
Trying Hard!

Sentence structure is repetitive and word choice is basic. Voice is undeveloped and tone is inconsistent.
Citation

Master

Sources as solid evidence are cited and applied. All quotes & paraphrases are introduced in essay using title and author of content quoted. Elegant flow and engaging to read. Primary sources evident. Article(s) from databases.
Approaching Expert

4-5 sources are present. All quotes & paraphrases introduced using title and author; essay is correctly composed using rhetorical format.
Source may be original document. Some sources are primary and articles are from databases.
Apprentice

3-4 sources are cited but may lack description. Quotes & paraphrases may be introduced using title and/or author, yet essay is not composed correctly in rhetorical format. Most sources are not primary source and derive from www.
Trying Hard!

Fewer than 3 sources are cited. Quotes & paraphrases are not introduced; essay not composed correctly in rhetorical format. Little or no research regarding case study/
Mechanics

Master

Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation are few and do not interfere with the reader's or audience's understanding.
Approaching Expert

Semi-frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation do not interfere with understanding.
Apprentice

Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation sometimes interfere with understanding.
Trying Hard!

Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation prevent reader from fully understanding the essay.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98