Skip to main content
iRubric: Scientific Notation-3 Facts & 1 Fib rubric

iRubric: Scientific Notation-3 Facts & 1 Fib rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Scientific Notation-3 Facts & 1 Fib 
Scientific Notation-3 Facts & 1 Fib
Students create Three Facts and a Fib about how scientific notation is used in our daily lives. Aligns to Ok Process Standards, Grades 6-8 Process Standard 1: Problem Solving; 6. Use oral, written, concrete, pictorial, graphical, and/or algebraic methods to model mathematical situations. Process Standard 2: Communication; 1. Discuss, interpret, translate (from one to another) and evaluate mathematical ideas (e.g., oral, written, pictorial, concrete, graphical, algebraic); and 3. Select and use appropriate terminology when discussing mathematical concepts and ideas. Process Standard 4: Connections 1. Apply mathematical strategies to solve problems that arise from other disciplines and the real world. Grade 8 PASS: Standard 2: Number Sense and Operation – The student will use numbers and number relationships to solve a variety of problems; 1. Number Sense: Represent and interpret large numbers and numbers less than one in exponential and scientific notation.
Rubric Code: S6A53X
By crystalofok2007
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Math  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric 3 Facts & 1 Fib
Scientific Notation--3 Facts & 1 Fib
  Excellent

Artifact met all of the criteria and provided additional information.

5 pts

Good

Artifact met all of the criteria

4 pts

Satisfactory

Artifact met most of the criteria.

3 pts

Poor

Artifact met little of the criteria.

2 pts

Unsatisfactory

Artifact did not meet criteria.

1 pts

Content Accuracy
2 pts

Statements contain pertinent information applicable to the use of scientific notation in a real-world setting.
Excellent

All three "facts" detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. The "fib" is not obvious.
Good

There is only one minor error in 1-2 of the facts; other than that, all three "facts" detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. The "fib" is not obvious.
Satisfactory

There is only major error in 1 of the facts; other than that, all three "facts" detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. The "fib" is not obvious.
Poor

There is a major error in 1-2 of the facts; other than that, all three "facts" detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. The "fib" is not obvious.
Unsatisfactory

There are major errors in all three facts.
Instructional Effectiveness
2 pts

Viewers can see the relationship between very large numbers and scientific notation with positive exponents and between very small numbers with negative exponents.
Excellent

There are at least 6 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents.
Good

There are 4-5 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents.
Satisfactory

There are 2-3 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents.
Poor

There are 1-2 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents.
Unsatisfactory

There are no accurate conversion examples and/or the examples used contain errors.
Presentation
2 pts

The artifact is neat and easy to read. Viewers want to examine the artifact based on how it appears.
Excellent

Information is neatly typed in Microsoft PowerPoint and set up to be viewed as a slide show with one statement per slide. Images that add meaning or context to the statements are included. Slides look neat and well-organized.
Good

Information is neatly typed in Microsoft PowerPoint and set up to be viewed as a slide show with one statement per slide. Images that add meaning or context to the statements are included.
Satisfactory

Information is neatly typed and affixed to index cards. One statement is included per card. Images that add meaning or context to the statements are include.
Poor

Information is neatly written on index cards. One statement is included per card. Images that add meaning or context to the statements are include.
Unsatisfactory

Information is difficult to read or is submitted on a plain sheet of paper.
Paper/Process
2 pts

Paper with definitions, examples, and process.
Excellent

300-400 word typed paper contains a student-friendly definition of scientific notation along with 4 or more accurate conversion examples (standard to scientific and vice versa) using both positive and negative exponents.
Good

300-400 word written paper contains a student-friendly definition of scientific notation along with 4 or more accurate conversion examples (standard to scientific and vice versa) using both positive and negative exponents. Must be legible.
Satisfactory

Fewer than 300- or more than 400-word typed paper contains a student-friendly definition of scientific notation along with 3 accurate conversion examples (standard to scientific and vice versa) using both positive and negative exponents.
Poor

Fewer than 300- or more than 400-word written paper contains a student-friendly definition of scientific notation along with 3 accurate conversion examples (standard to scientific and vice versa) using both positive and negative exponents. Must be legible.
Unsatisfactory

Fewer than 300- or more than 400-word written paper missing a student-friendly definition of scientific notation and having fewer than 3 accurate conversion examples (standard to scientific and vice versa) using both positive and negative exponents. Must be legible.
References
2 pts

A reference (website, magazine, etc) is provided for each image and fact.
Excellent

All image and information references are typed in MLA format and provided on a separate sheet of paper.
Good

All image and information references are in MLA format and provided on a separate sheet of paper.
Satisfactory

Image and information references are in MLA format and provided on a separate sheet of paper. There are 3-5 minor errors in that information is missing, or the format is wrong.
Poor

Image and information references are in MLA format and provided on a separate sheet of paper. There are 6-10 minor errors in that information is missing, or the format is wrong.
Unsatisfactory

Image and information references are in MLA format and provided on a separate sheet of paper. There are major errors in either missing information or the format is wrong.



Keywords:
  • collage scientific notation

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98