Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: IC C075 Annotated Bibliography rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
IC C075 Annotated Bibliography
Rubric for an annotated bibliography consisting of 5-6 annotations of resources used to support a research paper. All citations must use MLA format.
Rubric Code:
MXW462A
By
cclibrarian
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Annotated Bibliography Rubric
Poor
1 pts
Fair
3 pts
Good
5 pts
Source Selection
Poor
Fewer than six (6) sources OR six (6) sources with fewer than three (3) academically appropriate; sources are not relevant to researcher’s topic; sources necessitate extensive additional research
Fair
Six (6) sources, at least four (4) conforming to assignment guidelines; some sources chosen are relevant to the topic; writer may need additional sources to complete research
Good
Six (6) sources, all conforming to assignment guidelines; sources chosen are highly relevant to the topic; sources add greatly to research potential
Summary/Annotation
Poor
Most annotations are either too short or too long; annotations do not describe the source material; annotations offer no insight; no evidence that article has been read
Fair
Some annotations may be too short or too long; annotations adequately describe the source material, but lack insight; some evidence that article has been read
Good
Annotations succinctly and comprehensively describe the source material, the author's main point and conclusions, and offer great insight into the source material; it is evident that article has been read
Evaluation
Poor
Evaluation does not clearly explain why the sources were chosen; fails to adequately describe format/type of source; fails to evaluate and give evidence for author's authority; fails to adequately evaluate source (sponsoring organizations, publishers, etc.); fails to adequately discuss other necessary evaluation criteria (audience, objectivity, currency, accuracy, reliability/relevance, and purpose/point of view); sources are not very reliable with little justification for use
Fair
Evaluation sometimes explains why the sources were chosen; gave inadequate description of the format/type of the source; evaluated and gave some evidence for author’s authority; evaluated source (sponsoring organizations, publishers, etc.); discussed some necessary evaluation criteria (audience, objectivity, currency, accuracy, reliability/relevance, and purpose/point of view)
Good
Evaluation clearly explains why the sources were chosen; described the format/type of the source; evaluated and gave evidence for author’s authority; evaluated source (sponsoring organizations, publishers, etc.); discussed other necessary evaluation criteria (audience, objectivity, currency, accuracy, reliability/relevance, and purpose/point of view)
Credibility
Poor
Sources lack credibility
Fair
All sources are from credible, scholarly materials
Good
All sources are from credible, scholarly materials
In-text Citations
Poor
Lacking citations; unidentifiable connection to WC; citation not close to quote/paraphrase; unclear or confusing
Fair
Connection to Works Cited is unclear or confusing; may contain basic information; may be close to quote/paraphrase
Good
Clearly and obviously show connection to the Works Cited; contain relevant information; are as close to the quote/paraphrase as possible
MLA Formatting
Poor
Many errors in MLA formatting rules (margins, spacing, font, headers, page numbering, etc)
Fair
A few errors in MLA formatting rules (margins, spacing, font, headers, page numbering, etc)
Good
No errors in MLA formatting rules (margins, spacing, font, headers, page numbering, etc)
Works Cited
Poor
Works cited has less than three (3) sources and/or there are more than four (4) errors in MLA formatting
Fair
Works cited has at least three (3) sources and is formatted to MLA specification with the exception of two (2) errors
Good
Works cited has at least five (5) sources and is formatted to MLA specifications exactly
Grammar and Mechanics
Poor
Many mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors
Fair
A few mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors
Good
Free from mechanical, grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.