Skip to main content
iRubric: Oral Team Presentation rubric

iRubric: Oral Team Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Oral Team Presentation 
Oral Team Presentation
This rubric will be used to evaluate students' teaching ability while delivering a 15-20 minute presentation of a prepared lesson plan on a provided topic.
Rubric Code: H58896
By kc05kc
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Oral Presentation
  Poor

65 pts

Fair

75 pts

Good

85 pts

Excellent

100 pts

Teaching Content
40 %

Poor

The teaching lesson is very difficult to follow.

It is difficult to grasp the the content in the lesson taught.

There appears to be little or no organization or preparation.
Fair

There is little demonstrated organization of the lesson taught

There are parts of the lesson that are clear and easy to follow.

Improvement could be made with more preparation.
Good

The order of the lesson was easy to follow.

The presenter was well organized in their thought pattern.

The presenter was well prepared.
Excellent

There was a preview of main objectives of the lesson.

The presenter was well prepared.

The speaker presented in a clear confident manner

The presentation followed a very well prepared lesson plan.
Verbal communication skills
10 %

Poor

The presenter was unable to communicate effectively in English due to a limited vocabulary.

The presenter had many distracting speech transitions.

The presenter had poor projection.

The presenter had an inappropriate rate of delivery.
Fair

The presenter had trouble communicating effectively in English due to a limited vocabulary.

The presenter had several distracting speech transitions.

The presenter had poor elocution.

The presenter did not manage time well.
Good

The presenter had some problems in communicating effectively in English.

The presenter had few speech transitions.

The presenter projected their voice well.

The presenter managed time well.
Excellent

The presenter was able to communicate effectively in English.

The presenter had no distracting transitions.

The volume of the presenter was appropriate.

The rate of delivery was appropriate.

Time was managed well.
Non-verbal communication skills
10 %

Poor

Presenter had many distracting mannerisms.

Presenter made poor eye contact.

Posture and placement were poor.
Fair

The presenter had several distracting mannerisms.

Used hand gestures excessively.

Moved around too much or too little.
Good

The presenter had few distracting mannerisms.

Used hand gestures effectively.

Appropriate amount of eye contact.
Excellent

The presenter had no distracting mannerisms.

Presenter had excellent command of stage.

Presenter utilized gestures and facial expressions well.
Use of Visuals
10 %

Poor

No presentation was used AND without the visuals, it was difficult to follow the talk.
Fair

Presentation was disjointed with many typos and/or spelling error.
Good

Presentation was cohesive but contained typos and/or spelling errors. Slides were crowded with text.
Excellent

Presentation was cohesive with no typos and/or spelling errors. Slides were easy to read and follow.
Intros, Transitions and Conclusion
10 %

Poor

No signs of preparation and practice in the team. Difficult transitions between team members. Disorganized hand-offs. No compelling intro or conclusion.
Fair

Evidence of little preparation and practice in team. Order was followed but jumped around. Intro or conclusion was included but not both.
Good

Evidence of good preparation and practice. Strong intro or conclusion but not both. Team members were generally prepared for their parts.
Excellent

Strong evidence of good preparation and practice. Both intro and conclusions were compelling. Transitions between speakers were seamless.
Enter Title
20 %

Team Participation
Poor

Student did not participate with the team to develop this presentation. NOTE: Student will actually receive 0 points for the entire project.
Fair

Student did not participate routinely with the team to develop this presentation. Work was consistently submitted late and/or of poor quality causing re-work.
Good

Student participated in the project and produced good work that was on-time but not both.
Excellent

Student participated fully in the project producing good-quality work that was always on time. Team members would work with person again.



Keywords:
  • business, team, presentation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16