- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Interview Family Member rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Interview Family Member SLO #3 SOC 28 Identify themes, cycles that run in families and determine solutions for reducing social problems in our society Rubric Code: GBCX63 By proflevym Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Enter rubric title
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 5 pts
Introduction	Poor Student did not clearly identify the interviewee and/or the main theme in the family.	Fair Student did identify the interviewee but did not give enough background information and/or partially introduced themes in the family.	Good Student clearly identified the interviewee, gave some background information and clearly introduced the main themes in the family.
Analysis of Data part 1	Poor Student failed to provide a description of the person’s life course and/or did not address any unifying themes or patterns in the family.	Fair Student provided an adequate description of the person’s life course with limited reference to the themes explored in this course or patterns in the family.	Good Student described his/her understanding of the person’s life using examples to illustrate the general findings or themes or patterns in the family.
Conclusion/solutions	Poor Student failed to summarize what they found out about their family, the impact of issues in family, or solutions to reduce problems in the future.	Fair Student summarized some of what they found out about their family, its impact of issues today and discussed some solutions to reduce problems in the future.	Good Student summarized in depth what they found out about their family, the impact of those issues on their family today, and gave solutions to reducing problems in the future.
Analysis of research	Poor Student did not discuss interview experience, or role as interviewer, what they might do differently or if there were any issues during the interview.	Fair Student discussed some points about the interview experience, or role as interviewer, what they might do differently and issues during their interview.	Good Student adequately discussed their interview experience, or role as interviewer, what they might do differently and issues during their interview.
Writing Quality	Poor Student did not proof their paper for spelling, grammar or formatting errors.	Fair Student did proof their paper for spelling, grammar or formatting errors, but there were still a lot of errors.	Good Student did a great job with grammar, format, and organization of their paper with some minor spelling errors.
Oral Presentation	Poor Student failed to make a presentation. (0 points)	Fair	Good Student made appropriate presentation. (10 pts)