Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: ART RENDERING REFLECTION PARAGRAPH THE GREAT GATSBY rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
ART RENDERING REFLECTION PARAGRAPH THE GREAT GATSBY
VICE CHART PIECE RESPONSE THE GREAT GATSBY
Art rendering reflection paragraph per specific character vices and Light of the Lord.
Rubric Code:
D247C74
By
Irubric2229
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
ART RENDERING REFLECTION PARAGRAPH THE GREAT GATSB
EXCELLENT
(N/A)
SKILLED
(N/A)
DEVELOPING
(N/A)
INADEQUATE
(N/A)
VICE CHART PIECE CONTENT
EXCELLENT
Art Rendering Reflection Paragraph applies excellent critical thinking apparent in decidedly significant visual and sensory character images, descriptions and traits, applying, analyzing, and evaluating notable character traits from novel reading. Insightful and relevant connections made from rendering through contextual explanations and inferences.
SKILLED
Art Rendering Reflection Paragraph demonstrates some degree of critical thinking denoted in character images, descriptions, and traits, applying, analyzing and evaluating character traits from novel reading, making some connections through contextual explanations and inferences. Some connections made from rendering through contextual explanations and inferences.
DEVELOPING
Art Rendering Reflection Paragraph demonstrates limited critical thinking as character images, descriptions, and traits are void of application, analyzation and evaluation of character traits from novel reading. Limited connections made through contextual explanations and inferences. Limited and ambiguous connections made from rendering through contextual explanations and inferences.
INADEQUATE
Art Rendering Reflection Paragraph lacks critical thinking as character images, descriptions, and traits are absent of applications, analyzation and evaluation of character traits from novel reading. No connections are made from rendering through contextual explanations and inferences.
SYNTAX, GRAMMAR, MECHANICS, MLA
EXCELLENT
Analyzation of Art Rendering within Art Rendering Paragraph is excellently written, exhausting proper syntax, grammar and mechanics. MLA is consistently adhered to. All facets of topic sentence/statement are addressed, as well as components of formal paragraph are included, i.e., hook, comment on hook, cite and expounding sentences/statements per vices, and concluding sentence/statements per Bible verse that mirrors hook.
SKILLED
Analyzation of Art Rendering within Art Rendering Paragraph is well written, incorporating proper syntax, grammar and mechanics. MLA is addressed with few errors. Most facets of topic sentence/statement are addressed, and most components of formal paragraph are included, i.e., hook, comment on hook, cite and expounding sentences/statements per vices, and concluding sentence/statements per Bible verse that mirrors hook.
DEVELOPING
Analyzation of Art Rendering within Art Rendering Paragraph is not well written and lacks syntactical, grammatical and mechanical consistency. MLA is also inconsistently adhered to. Several facets of topic sentence/statement are excluded or ambiguous, and several components of formal paragraph are excluded or extremely ambiguous, i.e., hook, comment on hook, cite and expounding sentences/statements per vices, and concluding sentence/statements per Bible verse that mirrors hook.
INADEQUATE
Analyzation of Art Rendering within Art Rendering Paragraph is completely void of proper syntax, grammar and mechanics. MLA is not adhered to. Topic sentence/statement is excluded, and components of formal paragraph are excluded, i.e., hook, comment on hook, cite and expounding sentences/statements per vices, and concluding sentence/statements per Bible verse that mirrors hook.
GRADE DEMARCATIONS
EXCELLENT
50/100 4.5
48/95 4.0
45/90 3.5
SKILLED
43/85 3
40/80 2.5
DEVELOPING
38/75 2
35/70 1.5
INADEQUATE
33/65 1.0
30/60 .5
Keywords:
writing, journals
Subjects:
English
Types:
Project
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.