Skip to main content
iRubric: Medical Ethics Case Study and Oral Presentation rubric

iRubric: Medical Ethics Case Study and Oral Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Medical Ethics Case Study and Oral Presentation 
Biomedical Ethics Case Study and Oral Presentation
Students are to work in a group to define the type of Malpractice or Tort that took place. State where the negligence occurred, what the patient originally presented for, what went wrong, how it could have been prevented, what the case settlement was, what they would do in the position of the physician, and what they would do in the position of the patient. Presentation will be in PowerPoint form. Any students absent for this assignment will be forced to work alone and will lose points.
Rubric Code: AA79A7
By amandasimone4
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Case study presentation
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Points

(N/A)

Presentation
20 %

Communication (group)
Poor

The oral presentation was inarticulate and difficult to follow with poor cohesion between points presented. Presented by only a single member of the group. Poor discussion of questions.
Fair

The oral presentation was choppy, difficult to follow with little cohesion between points presented and between members of the group. Some of the members of the group participated in the presentation. Needs more interaction and discussion of questions.
Good

The oral presentation was mostly smooth and seamless with good cohesion between points presented and between members of the group. Most of the members of the group participated in the presentation.<BR>
Proficient discussion initiated/ maintained.
Excellent

The oral presentation was smooth and seamless with excellent cohesion and flow between points and group members. All members of the group participated in the presentation. Exceptional discussion initiated and maintained to facilitate learning.
Points
Presentation
20 %

Communication (individual)
Poor

The oral presentation was inarticulate and difficult to follow. Poor delivery and timing of information. Did not seem to know the material. Pitch of ideas was not enthusiastic or persuasive.
Fair

The oral presentation was choppy, difficult to follow. The presenter did not have a grasp on the information. Frequent pauses for him or her to find their place. Too much reading. Pitch of ideas had little enthusiasm.
Good

The oral presentation was mostly smooth and seamless, few verbal pauses. The presenter appeared calm, had a general grasp of information. Proficient delivery and timing of information. Pitch of ideas was enthusiastic.
Excellent

The oral presentation was smooth and seamless. The presenter appeared calm and in command of the information. Exceptional delivery. Pitch of ideas was enthusiastic and persuasive.
Points
Presentation
10 %

Creativity
Poor

The group took little to no time to brainstorm ideas for this assignment. The presentation showed no creativity with how the case study was presented.
Fair

The group took some time to brainstorm for the assignment. The presentation showed little creativity with how the case study was presented
Good

There is evidence that the group brainstormed new ideas and showed some originality in their presentation of the case study.
Excellent

The group used their originality and creativity to create a comprehensive presentation of the case study.
Points
Content - Information
25 %

Application
Poor

Weak conclusions. Presentation needs to be more logical and organized.
Fair

Group does not understand the case information. Unrealistic solutions.
Good

The group somewhat understands the dynamics, presented some realistic alternatives, objectives, some sound implementation strategies.
Excellent

The group understands the dynamics, presented realistic alternatives, objectives, sound implementation strategies.
Points
Content - Analysis
25 %

Thinking/Inquiry
Poor

Lack of critical or analytical thought and little to no insight utilized.
Fair

More details, insight, and critical thought needed.
Good

Proficient critical analysis of issue and impact using many details and evidence. Moderate insight into issue.
Excellent

Exceptional insight into critical components & analysis of issue utilizing many details and evidence.
Points



Keywords:
  • case study, oral presentation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98