Skip to main content
iRubric: Mapping Earthquakes-Seismic History rubric

iRubric: Mapping Earthquakes-Seismic History rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Mapping Earthquakes-Seismic History 
Rubric Code: A945CX
By stharayil
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Geology  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
  Exceed Standards

4 pts

Meets Standards

3 pts

Approaching Standards

2 pts

Far Below Standards

1 pts

Content
5 pts

Exceed Standards

A comprehensive, thorough account of the region's seismic history and tendencies is provided. A strong analysis of a seismic hazards map or other data is provided. Significant past seismic activity is noted and described All or most questions listed in the assignment instructions are well answered.
Meets Standards

A fairly comprehensive account of the region's seismic history and tendencies is provided. An analysis of a seismic hazards map or other data is provided. Some information about past seismic activity is noted and described All or most questions listed in the assignment instructions are answered. However, the inclusion of more information could have improved the composition.
Approaching Standards

Some information regarding the seismic history of the region is provided. Quality of information could be improved Analysis of seismic hazards map is present but somewhat shallow. Some questions listed in the assignment instructions are answered.
Far Below Standards

Little to no information regarding the seismic history of the region is provided. Quality of analysis is poor, unsophisticated or unimportant. Several questions on assignment instructions are left unanswered.
Writing style and conventions
3 pts

Spelling and Grammar
Word Choice
Sophisticated writing style
Exceed Standards

Writing is sophisticated and eloquent. Word choice is exceptional and varied. Sentence variety and fluency are also excellent.There are few to no spelling or grammatical errors. The composition is overall very captivating to read.
Meets Standards

The composition is fairly well written and fluent. Word choice is varied. There are a few spelling and/or grammatical errors. Some sentence variety exists. The composition is fairly interesting to read.
Approaching Standards

The composition is comprehensible, with some varied word choice. Sentence structure is minimally varied. There are some spelling and/or grammatical errors.
Far Below Standards

The composition is bland and/or confusing. Word choice is unvaried and unsophisticated. Sentence structure is simple and unvaried. There are several spelling and/or grammatical errors.
Formatting and Originality
1 pts

Exceed Standards

Composition follows ALL formatting guidelines. Work is original and information is well synthesized, demonstrating a clear, and strong understanding of all the gathered information.
Meets Standards

Composition follows most formatting guidelines. Work is original and information is synthesized appropriately, demonstrating a clear understanding of all the gathered information.
Approaching Standards

Composition follows some formatting guidelines. Work is somewhat original, not well synthesized. It is somewhat incoherent.
Far Below Standards

Composition does not follow formatting guidelines. Work is unoriginal and not well synthesized. It is incoherent.
References/Sources
1 pts

Enter description
Exceed Standards

Multiple (at least 3) CREDIBLE, RELIABLE and sophisticated sources are cited correctly and appropriately. Information selected from the sources were relevant, appropriate and substantiated the main points.
Meets Standards

Some CREDIBLE, RELIABLE sources are cited correctly and appropriately. The use of some unreliable sources are also cited. Information selected from the sources were fairly relevant, appropriate and substantiated the main points.
Approaching Standards

Some sources are cited. However, the sources are not reliable or credible. Citations and a bibliography are provided but are improperly written. Information selected from them are not all relevant.
Far Below Standards

Few to no credible or reliable sources are cited. There are no citations or bibliography. Information selected is irrelevant.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16