Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: AP Biology Presentation Rubric 2016

iRubric: AP Biology Presentation Rubric 2016

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
AP Biology Presentation Rubric 2016 Presentation 2 rubric This purpose of this presentation was to become familiar with presenting scientific data to an audience. Rubric Code: A68X26 By hwcameron Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Biology Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Presentation
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts	Failed 1 pts
Slides	Excellent The slides contained: 1) The title slide was distinct from the rest of the slide. 2) No sentences on the slides other than data. Unless needed for impact. 3) One chart/figure at a time per slide to minimize confusion 4) Slide was annotated in a clear, accurate, professional manner 5)"Open floor" slide present at the end	Good The slides contained 4 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.	Fair The slides contained 3 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.	Poor The slides contained 2 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.	Failed The slides contained 1 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Content	Excellent 1) The project included all information relevant to the topic in an organized fashion. 2) Material was presented accurately and in an appropriately detailed fashion. 3) All org. tests are mentioned with additional info. 4) References for information are posted 5) Cladogram showing relationship	Good The slides contained 4 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.	Fair The slides contained 3 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.	Poor The slides contained 2 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.	Failed The slides contained 1 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Organization	Excellent The presentation contained all of the following properties: 1) The title slide was descriptive and contained the name of the presenter with the date. 2) Slide transition was smooth and timely. 3) The presentation flowed in a logical manner (Intro Results Conclusion) 4) A summary slide was presented	Good The slides contained most of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.	Fair The slides contained 3 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.	Poor The slides contained 2 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.	Failed The slides contained 1 of the properties outlined in the 5 pt column.
Time management	Excellent The presentation was within the 3-5-10 min allotted time frame.	Good The presentation was under allotted time frame by 1 minute.	Fair The presentation was under allotted time frame by 2 minute.	Poor The presentation was under allotted time frame by 3 minute.	Failed Was a waste of time or no presentation.
Presentation/interaction	Excellent The presenter: 1) Spoke loudly and clearly. 2) Spoke with cadence (not monotone). 3) Faced the audience. 4) Engaged the audience (looked up and at people in the audience). 5) Was not distracting the audience (jingling keys in the pocket, etc.) 6) Was not reading from script cards verbatim.	Good The presenter followed 5 of the points outlined in the 5 pt column.	Fair The presenter followed 4 of the points outlined in the 5 pt column.	Poor The presenter followed 3 of the points outlined in the 5 pt column.	Failed The presenter followed 2 of the points outlined in the 5 pt column.
Work quality/effort	Excellent The work done was excellent. The appropriate amount of effort was put into completing the presentation and making understandable to the audience.	Good The work was done with good effort. The appropriate amount of effort was put into completing the presentation.	Fair Work was done with fair effort. It was evident that the work was rushed.	Poor Work was done with little effort. It was evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.	Failed Failed to present or did not contribute to the finale product adequately.
requirements met	Excellent 10 out of 13 points of info. required were met during the presentation	Good 8 out of 13 points of info. required were met during the presentation	Fair 6 out of 13 points of info. required were met during the presentation	Poor <6 out of 13 points of info. required were met during the presentation	Failed 0 out of 13 points of info. required were met during the presentation
Attitude toward work	Excellent 1) Student seemed genuinely interested in the work and lab. 2) Was able to answer questions from audience; including teacher.	Good Student seemed genuinely interested in the work or lab, but allowed an obvious disconnect with the audience; discontent/frustrated	Fair Student seemed genuinely interested in the work or lab, but allowed audience to see discontent/frustrated and was unsure of their work or unprepared.	Poor Student seemed disinterested in the work and lab	Failed Lazy or Bad attitude

Keywords:

Microbiology presentation

Subjects:

Biology

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Biology rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98