Skip to main content
iRubric: Forensic iPhone XIV STEAM rubric

iRubric: Forensic iPhone XIV STEAM rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Forensic iPhone XIV STEAM 
Teams will incorporate 12-15 student designed apps to meet the needs of CSI's, detectives, or other forensic experts. Their poster or slide presentation will be proportional to the iPhone XIV, will have images with rationale and operational information on the back. APA source documentation, and 3 additional capabilities not already on the iPhone XIV. Contact list, data bases, and protective case also required.
Rubric Code: UXB7A9X
By kathy_snyder
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Forensic iPhone XIV
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

3.5 pts

Good

5 pts

Excellent

6.5 pts

1. Brainstorming list

Due at the end of class on January 22. (Individual grade.)
Poor

Student did not submit a list of apps.
Fair

Contains fewer than 8 ideas.
Good

Contains between 9 and 12 ideas.
Excellent

Contains more than 12 ideas.
2. Group discussion

Individual grade
Poor

Student did not contribute to the group discussion, did not take the project seriously, or worked against group consensus.
Fair

Student written input was acceptable, however the student did not add substantively to the group discussion.
Good

Student listened to all ideas, exhibited ability to compromise, worked to come to a consensus while contributing ideas.
Excellent

Student actively and diplomatically guided discussion, sought to include quieter members, worked to maintain progress without angst.
2.5 Three Apps per student

10 points per App
This row = 30 points max.
Poor

Missing.
Fair

<3 apps, format was not followed, required information poorly written.
Good

Two of criteria in excellent category are missing. 3 Apps at a minimum.
Excellent

Creative App name, and image. Rational is thorough, description of its function and how to use it is clear. Highly applicable to forensics personnel. 3 Apps at a minimum.
3. Images: non copyright

Individual grade
Poor

More than three images associated with the Apps included a source, and/or images were not copyrighted.
Fair

Two or three images associated with the Apps included a source, and/or images were not copyrighted.
Good

One image associated with the Apps included a source, and images were not copyrighted.
Excellent

Each image associated with the Apps included a source, and images were not copyrighted.
4. Resources in APA

Individual grade:
all image and content sources in APA
Poor

< 50% of sources were documented correctly APA
(Includes both images and sources)
Fair

All images were documented correctly APA, 3 or more resource sites were not documented correctly.
Good

All images were documented correctly APA, 1 or 2 resource sites were not documented correctly.
Excellent

All images were documented correctly APA, All resource sites were documented correctly.
5. Power for phone

Group: list of features
Individual: research, technical details, rationale, design
Poor

No creative solution to the problem of powering a phone without electricity.
Fair

Minimally creative solution to the problem of powering a phone without electricity.
Good

Ingenious design of phone powering system, however it is not completely independent of external devices.
Excellent

Ingenious and independent power system is very creative.
6. Unique capabilities

Individual grade
Poor

No unique capability was submitted.
Fair

Unique capability was submitted, however this was determined to be on other devices and is not novel.
Good

Unique capability was submitted, however this novel feature is not relevant to forensic personnel.
Excellent

Unique capability was submitted, and this novel feature is relevant to forensic personnel.
7. Dimensions

Poor

No thought to iPhone dimensions.
Fair

Width or height is close to being correct.
Good

Width or height is correct.
Excellent

Both width and height are proportionally correct to dimensions of the iPhone XIV.
8. Case

Group: Discussion
Individual: protection, water resistance, suspension, or sensitivity.
Poor

No case included
Fair

Case meets some of the needs of forensic investigators, but shows little creativity.
Good

Case is well designed, water proof, and thoughtfully designed with rationale for its design features.
Excellent

Creative, well-referenced, waterproof and intelligently designed case with multiple additional functions.
9. Phone design

Plan and finished design, group and individual
Poor

acceptable, but not creative
Fair

Evidence of thought, symmetry, and forensic scientists' needs
Good

Evidence of thought, symmetry, and forensic scientists' needs. Special features, dimensions, buttons that enhance its operation. Somewhat colorful.
Excellent

Evidence of thought, symmetry, and forensic scientists' needs. Many special features, dimensions, buttons that enhance its operation. Colorful and attractive.
10. Photographic capabilities

Individual grade based on 1:
Odontology, Shoe, Anthropology, tool and kerf
Poor

No modifications to photo capabilities.
Fair

Minimal effort to include adjustment to photography, or there was not discussion pursuant to student's topic.
Good

Clear, & creative presentation of photo modifications to achieve instant access to forensic experts OR data bases. (Not both.)
Excellent

Clear, creative, unique presentation of photo modifications to achieve instant access to forensic experts and data bases.
11. Contact List

Group: discussion
Poor

No contact list.
Fair

List is incomplete, and/or shows lack of thorough reflection.
Good

List if present and somewhat functional.
Excellent

Creative, efficient, functional list of contacts that enable forensic personnel speedy contact.
12. Punctuality

Individual and group components
Poor

Not complete at deadline
Fair

Complete except for case at deadline.
Good

Complete except for minor touches.
Excellent

Complete, and submitted at the beginning of class.
13. Effort

Poor

minimal effort
Fair

substantive effort, but poor time management
Good

Good, solid effort. With better time management some of the features could have been improved.
Excellent

Excellent time management, and product.
14.Group presentation

Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent



Keywords:
  • Forensics, iPhone XI, app design, CSI

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98