Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Justification Paper (Grad School Theatrical Design) rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Justification Paper (Grad School Theatrical Design)
Justification Paper (Theatrical Design)
Rubric Code:
R2XA44X
By
DrNikki
Ready to use
Private Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Design Justification
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Proficient
4 pts
Explanation of Design
40 %
Poor
No clear description or explanation of design. Student has not shown the reader what the paper is about with any clarity.
Fair
Attempt at a description or explanation. However, points of discussion that support the design don't or barely exist. Some points may not be followed up on in the paper.
Good
Justificaiton of design is clearly identifiable. Points of discussion are evident in the introduction and followed up in the body of the paper.
Proficient
Explanation of Desgin is clear, concise, and is justified appropriately. The paper follows up on each point of discussion throughout the paper.
Organization
20 %
Poor
The paper is very hard to follow. No sense of order or flow. Reader loses a sense of what the writer is trying to convey.
Fair
Justification is attempted but strays off topic or bounces around somewhat.
Good
There is a justification, introduction and conclusion and the paper has an orderly flow.
Proficient
There is a clear justification and the writer connects each point with appropriate transitions. The paper is logical in its flow and direction.
Quality of Evidence
20 %
Poor
Sounds as though writer was writing off the top of theirhead and trying to fake their way through the paper. Many facts are wrong and arguments don't stand up to reason.
Fair
Wrting has minimal evidence and/or logic to their arguments. There is an attempt to use examples and/or evidence to build a case but it is mostly ineffective.
Good
There is a clear use of examples and/or cited evidence from a credible source. Most of the evidence is of good quality and fits with the case the paper is making in the thesis.
Proficient
Obvious use of other credible sources with citations to back up the writer's assertions. All evidence is directly tied to the thesis in an effective manner and supports the thesis/points of discussion.
Conventions
10 %
Poor
Numerous errors distract the reader and make it difficult to read. Errors made mroe than one way for the same word/phrase.
Fair
Limited control of conventions. Some errors in common patterns that partially hinder the reader's ability to follow the paper.
Good
Control of most writing conventions. Errors are few and minor.
Proficient
Exceptionally strong control of standard conventions of writing.
Improvements to Writing
10 %
Poor
No/minimal demonstration of brainstroming, outlining, drafts, or attempts to improve upon their writing.
Fair
Does not show many revisions to clear up languge, organization, fluency, conventions or writing style.
Good
Evidence of a clear progression from beginning ideas to organized thoughts, pre-writing to drafts, rough drafts to improved final drafts.
Proficient
Obvious continuous improvement culminating in an articulate and well'thought through argument for the thesis.
Subjects:
Arts and Design
History
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Arts and Design rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Add to Gallery
Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.