Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Pre-Calculus Project 1 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Pre-Calculus Project 1
AP Calculus AB Research and Development Project
Topic You are Concerned About or Passionate About Small Group Project with Google Slide Presentation DUE DATE: OCTOBER 1, 2020
Rubric Code:
R2X8X2W
By
sdenlinger
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Math
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Areas of Proficiency
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Great
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Introduction
Poor
No introduction is included.
(Title, Names of group members, Date, along with second slide introducing the general idea of the topic.
Fair
Introduction is identified, but no information is provided.
Good
Introduction is included but it is hard to make sense of.
Great
Introduction is included, however it's a bit vague or confusing.
Excellent
Introduction is included which makes sense and explains what this the chosen problem is about.
Explanation of Process
Poor
No description of the mathematical process was given. The mathematics is not incorporated and therefore the conclusion is not supported.
Fair
Mathematical process is identified, but no information is provided.
Good
Mathematical process is included but it is hard to make sense of.
Great
Mathematical process is included, however it's a bit vague or confusing.
Excellent
A mathematical process is explained in depth and is easily understood. The mathematics is incorporated as smoothly and naturally as possible.
Possible Errors
Poor
Four or more errors were made.
Fair
Three errors or mistakes were made resulting.
Good
Two errors or mistakes were made.
Great
One error or mistake is evident.
Excellent
No errors or mistakes were made.
Conclusion
Poor
No conclusion is provided and no suspect was arrested.
Fair
Conclusion provides little information or is very difficult to make sense of.
Good
Conclusion is confusing or hard to understand.
Great
Conclusion is vague or has some difficult parts to understand.
Excellent
In depth conclusion of the problem is given.
Creativity
Poor
Fair
Little to no effort nor creativity is demonstrated.
Good
Satisfactory effort in creativity is demonstrated.
Great
Excellent
Exceeds all expectations. Final product is unique and totally the groups own.
Depth
Poor
Fair
Your project addressed one math concept and one solution technique was evident.
Good
Your project addressed more than one concept but only one solution technique was evident.
Great
Your project addressed two to three math concepts but was not as deep into the concepts and more than one solution technique was evident. The problem could have been extended further.
Excellent
Your project used a variety of concepts and solution techniques. The problem was extended to its fullest. Expectations were exceeded.
Clarity
Poor
Fair
The presentation is unclear. It is difficult to determine what the problem is and the subsequent solution.
Good
The presentation is adequate but is in need of further explanation in order to fully understand the problems and solutions.
Great
The presentation is above average in that most of the material can be understood. Further explanation is necessary.
Excellent
Your presentation is clear and concise and can be understood quickly. No further explanation is necessary.
Neatness and Organization
Poor
Fair
The final product appears sloppy and unorganized. It is hard to know what information is being presented.
Good
The work is presented in an organized fashion but may be hard to understand at times.
Great
The work is presented in a neat, clear, organized fashion that is usually easy to understand.
Excellent
The work is presented in a neat, clear, organized fashion that is easy to understand.
Timeliness
Poor
The project is late.
Fair
Good
Great
Excellent
The project is turned in on time (DUE DATE: Thursday, October 1st, 2020)
Participation
Poor
Four or more combined absences or tardies on four or more of the scheduled project days (including the date project is due). Serious issues with communication and collaboration.
Fair
Three combined absences or tardies on three of the scheduled project days (including the date project is due). Some struggles with collaboration communication.
Good
Two combined absences or tardies on two of the scheduled project days (including the date project is due). Some struggles with collaboration.
Great
One absence or tardy on one of the scheduled project days (including the date project is due). Good, visible collaboration and discussion among all team members.
Excellent
No absences on the scheduled project days (including the date project is due). Excellent communication and collaboration among team members.
Collaboration
Poor
Serious issues of collaboration amongst ALL team members.
Fair
Some collaboration among all team members. Progress seems to be sporadic during designated class time.
Good
More collaboration among all team members with some designated time not used productively.
Great
Most of the designated class time assigned for project is used for productive results towards the final outcome of the presentation.
Excellent
Time spent on project is visible and verbally expressed by continuously producing excellent work in each designated class time.
Conferences
Poor
Did not consult with teacher to discuss the project phases during the designated time line assigned during class.
Fair
Good
Met with teacher once to discuss the project.
Great
Met with teacher twice to discuss project.
Excellent
Met with teacher at least three times to discuss the project.
Subjects:
Math
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Math rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.