Skip to main content
iRubric: Online presentations for H818 rubric

iRubric: Online presentations for H818 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Online presentations for H818 
Online Video Presentation / Paper
Rubric to grade online presentations for H818 conferences
Rubric Code: JXCXX43
By VSHIndle74
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Rationale
  Room for development

5 pts

Good

10 pts

Excellent

15 pts

Rationale for topic/project

Room for development

Does not demonstrate understanding topic chosen for project. Lack of strong opinion on topic. Ill prepared to justify choice of topic. Lack of research on project.
Good

Reasonable understanding of chosen topic. Clear justification for choice of topic. Some outside research is obvious. Somewhat prepared to answer questions above their opinion.
Excellent

Displays excellent understanding of topic. Makes a very strong position on subject matter to conference. Displays obvious time spent on additional research to support choice of topic for presentation. Answers questions in an authoritative manner.
Relevancy
  Room for development

5 pts

Good

10 pts

Excellent

15 pts

Relevance of chosen theme

Room for development

The presenter has not chosen a theme that is relevant for the H818 conference (e.g. Inclusion, innovation or implementation)
Good

The presenter has chosen a relevant theme, but this is not clearly communicated during their presentation.
Excellent

The presenter has chosen a relevant theme and this is clearly communicated during the presentation.
Overarching conference title

Room for development

The speaker's presentation makes little or no reference to the overarching conference title of 'Openness'
Good

The presenter has discussed the concept of openness, but does not always relate to their own project.
Excellent

The presenter has clearly discussed how openness relates to their own project and has provided examples of openness e.g. Open Educational resources, MOOC.s
Understanding
  Room for development

5 pts

Good

10 pts

Excellent

15 pts

Understanding of topic

Room for development

Does not display a clear grasp of subject being discussed. Little if any research done. Disorganized written presentation.
Good

Displays a reasonable grasp of topic. Some research done, with most sources cited.
Excellent

Displays excellent understanding of topic. Substantial research and all sources cited. Opinion strongly expressed and supported with research evidence. Above average time and preparation.
SPaG
  Room for development

5 pts

Good

10 pts

Excellent

15 pts

Written Grammar/ Spelling/ Punctuat

Room for development

More than 6 errors present. Sloppy presentation. Did not follow written paper guidelines in syllabus.
Good

3 to 5 errors, that are smaller in magnitude (i.e. spelling). Followed guidelines outlined in syllabus.
Excellent

0 to 2 small errors. Followed guidelines exactly. Clean and professional paper.
Presentation materials
  Room for development

5 pts

Good

10 pts

Excellent

15 pts

Quality of presentation

Room for development

Too much or little text on slides. There are no images on the slides. The presentation does not flow from one slide to the next in a logical sequence. No use of animation. Accessibility needs have not been considered e.g. text too small which might make it difficult for people with visual impairments to read. Presenter's voice is not audible or clear.
Good

Most slides have a good balance of images and text. There is some good use of animation. Most of the presentation flows from one slide to the next in a logical sequence. Some consideration of accessibility needs. Presenter's voice is generally audible and clear.
Excellent

All slides have a good balance of images and text which help to engage the reader. Overall, some excellent use of animations. All of the presentation flows from one slide to the next in a logical sequence. Presenter's voice is very audible and clear.
Delivery
  Room for development

5 pts

Good

10 pts

Excellent

15 pts

Quality of delivery

Room for development

Not very confident delivery. The presenter stumbles over words throughout the presentation. The presenter may have benefitted from more practice before the conference. The presentation is too short (less than 7 minutes) or too long (does not finish within allocated time of 10 minutes)
Good

The presenter may stumble over some words during the presentation, but in general, the presenter is fairly confident. The presentation may be a little too short (around 8 minutes) and may just go over the allocated time (e.g. 10 minutes and 30 seconds).
Excellent

Confident delivery throughout the presentation. The presenter has cleary practiced their presentation and knows their topic well. The presentations is not too short (e.g. delivered within 9 minutes) or too long (delivered within the allocated time of 10 minutes)



Keywords:
  • online conference review



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98