Skip to main content
  • help_outline help
iRubric: JU_COUN 5551 1 F11 Discussion Board Responses rubric

iRubric: JU_COUN 5551 1 F11 Discussion Board Responses rubric

preview rubric

 
find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   apply to...   delete     Do more...  

JU_COUN 5551 1 F11 Discussion Board Responses
Threaded discussion rubric built in part around Bloom's digital taxonomy (http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Rubrics+-+Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy#toc0) and iRubric examples.
Rubric Code: ZXXC92C
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate


Powered by iRubric Discussion Board
Measurement Standards
  Exceeds Competency

Effort at this level evidences some mastery of the material and is graded as "A-" or "A"graded as "A-" or "A"

10 pts

Meets Competency

Effort at this level represents developmentally appropriate understanding of the material therefore graded in the "B" to "B+" range

8.6 pts

Below Competency

Effort at this level is less than expected and is graded as "C- or below

5 pts

Moodle Post construction
10 pts

(Up to 10 points)

Exceeds Competency

Posts show insight, depth, & understanding. They connect with the topic and include references to supporting material when appropriate (e.g., URLs, files). Personal opinion is appropriately expressed & clearly related to the thread
Meets Competency

Posts are somewhat simplistic but show some insight, depth, or connection to the key question. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opinion is appropriately expressed & posts as a whole show understanding
Below Competency

Simple posts that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the key question. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.
Moodle Reply construction
10 pts

(Up to 10 points)

Exceeds Competency

Replies show insight, depth, & understanding. They connect with the original post and add to that post by including references to supporting material when appropriate (e.g., URLs, files). Personal opinion is appropriately expressed & clearly related to original post.
Meets Competency

Replies are simple but show moderate insight, depth, or connection to the original post. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opinion is appropriately expressed & posts as a whole show understanding.
Below Competency

Simple replies that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the key question. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.
Evaluation: Critique
10 pts

(Up to 10 points)

Exceeds Competency

Provides, in an appropriate manner, constructive criticism of other posts/replies that should be of considerable help to the original author.
Meets Competency

Provides, in an appropriate manner, constructive criticism of other posts/replies that should be of considerable help to the original author.
Below Competency

Little or no effort appears to be made to provide constructive criticism of other posts or replies.
Evaluation: Questions
5 pts

(Up to 5 points)

Exceeds Competency

Poses/replies to especially focused or challenging questions in a way showing significant understanding of the topic and a good ability to defend one's position.
Meets Competency

Poses/replies to especially focused or challenging questions in a way showing significant understanding of the topic and a good ability to defend one's position.
Below Competency

Little or no effort appears to be made to pose appropriate questions or to respond to questions posed by others.
Community Contribution
10 pts

(Up to 10 points)

Exceeds Competency

Consistently provides leadership and creativity by engaging and encouraging the learning community. Provides and appropriate level of opinion and personal disclosure.
Meets Competency

Some attempts at directing discussion or presenting viewpoints that encourages group involvement.
Below Competency

Little or no effort is made to participate in the development of the community.
Grammar/Mechanics
5 pts

(Up to 5 points)

Exceeds Competency

Posts/replies consistently show good grammar, have few or no spelling errors, and are presented in a structure/format that enhances readability.
Meets Competency

Posts/replies have few spelling and grammatical errors. Text construction is clear with few abbreviations or txt style language.
Below Competency

Poor spelling and grammatical errors in multiple posts/replies. Written in language that is unclear or difficult to comprehend, using frequent abbreviations or txt



Keywords:
  • Bloom's taxonomy, online discussion board, threaded discussion







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2020 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n178