- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: IRAC Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
IRAC Rubric IRAC Rubric Negotiation & Conflict Resolution Rubric Code: ZX9B36B By aterpollari Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Law Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

IRAC
	Unsatisfactory (N/A)	Minimal (N/A)	Effective (N/A)	Outstanding (N/A)
Issue	Unsatisfactory The relevant area of law is not identified.<BR> 0 marks	Minimal The area of law is correctly identified but the statement does not clearly describe the legal problem(s) that need to be addressed.<BR> 0.5 - 1 mark	Effective The area of law and the legal problem(s) to be addressed are identified but the description of the problem(s) are not clear or are incomplete.<BR> 1.5 - 2.5 marks	Outstanding The area of law and the legal problem(s) to be addressed are identified and clearly and completely described<BR> 3 marks
Rules	Unsatisfactory No relevant legal principles have been identified.<BR> 0 marks	Minimal Some identification of relevant legal principes but the correct source of authority (Section of Act or relevant case) has not been cited.<BR> 0.5 - 2 marks	Effective All or most of the relevant legal principles and their correct source of authority has been cited but the explanation of the principles is not clear or is incomplete.<BR> 2.5 - 4 marks	Outstanding All relevant legal principles are clearly explained and their correct source of authority is given<BR> 4.5 marks
Application/Analysis	Unsatisfactory The discussion of the facts does not refer to any relevant legal principles.<BR> 0 marks	Minimal The discussion considers some of the relevant legal principles but does not apply those principles to the key facts to support logical arguments about how the Issue(s) will be resolved.<BR> 0.5 - 3 marks	Effective The discussion considers the application of most of the relevant legal principles to the key facts but the arguments are not clear or are incomplete.<BR> 3.5 marks -5.5 marks	Outstanding The discussion is a clear and comprehensive analysis of the relevant legal principles and their application to the facts to support logical arguments about how the Issue(s) will be resolved<BR> 6 marks
Conclusion	Unsatisfactory The Conclusion is not stated or is not supported.<BR> 0 marks	Minimal The Conclusion is supported by some of the arguments but does not explain how they address the Issue(s).<BR> 0.5 marks	Effective The Conclusion is supported by most of the arguments but the explanation of how those arguments address the Issue(s) is not clear or is incomplete<BR> 1 mark	Outstanding The Conclusion is well supported by arguments in the Application section and clearly explains how those arguments address the Issue(s).<BR> 1.5 marks