iRubric: The Social Network rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

The Social Network

Given Part 1 of To Kill a Mockingbird, demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of characters using textual-based evidence from the novel to create a social networking profile.

Rubric Code: ZX6A822

By brandodm

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

The Social Network
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Satisfactory 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Quality of Content	Excellent Project displays content and details that are truly relevant, interesting, meaningful, engaging and specific. This group thoughtfully engaged with the details of his or her content.	Good Project displays content and details that are mostly relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This group engaged with the details of his or her content.	Satisfactory Project displays content and details that are somewhat relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This group should have more thoughtfully engaged with the details of his or her content.	Fair Project displays content and details that are limited and not very relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This group did not thoughtfully engage with the details of his or her content.	Poor Project does not display content and details that are relevant, interesting, meaniningful, engaging and specific. This group did not thoughtfully engage with the details of his or her content.
Style & Creativity	Excellent Project has extremely creative and original ideas. Demonstrates a superior ability to communicate with clarity and flair. Is fluent, varied, precise and vivid in expression. The project had a strong 'voice' and was distinctive.	Good Project has several creative and original ideas. Demonstrates a sound ability to communicate clearly. Attempts to be fluent, and vivid in expression. Most aspects showed a satisfactory and unique voice.	Satisfactory Project has some creative and original ideas. Demonstrates an inconsistent ability to communicate clearly. Some aspects demonstrate a satisfactory and unique voice.	Fair Project has minimal creativity and original ideas.Demonstrates a weak ability to communicate clearly. The group's unique voice was lacking.	Poor Project has little to no creative and original ideas which prevent the ability to communicate ideas.
Supporting Evidence	Excellent Group identified a direct quote or passage for each of their 10 posts including a clear, precise, and in-depth paragraph synthesis as support. Student inferences show a superior understanding of character.	Good Group identified a direct quote or passage for each of their 10 posts including a clear, precise, and well-defined paragraph synthesis to support their posts. Student inferences show a developed understanding of character.	Satisfactory Group identified a direct quote or passage for each of their 10 posts including a clear and precise paragrapgh synthesis to support their posts. Student inferences show a basic understanding of character.	Fair Group identified a direct quote or passage for each of their 10 posts. Paragraph synthesis is unclear or confusing of their understanding of character.	Poor Inadequate material on which to assess or is unclear and confusing. Major portions of the criteria are not met. Group did not identify a direct quote or passage for each of their 10 posts or provide a paragraph synthesis for each.
Mechanics	Excellent Paragraph synthesis has proper structure (sentences contain relevant evidence/ information). Sentences are complete, and each sentence has the correct capitalization and punctuation.	Good Paragraph synthesis has proper structure. Sentences are complete, and few capitalization and punctuation errors.	Satisfactory Paragraph synthesis contains inconsistent sentence structure. Paragraph contains some sentence fragments and capitalization and punctuation errors.	Fair Paragraph synthesis contains inconsistent sentence structure (including irrelevant evidence/information). Paragraph contains many sentence fragments and capitalization and punctuation errors.	Poor Paragraph synthesis does not have proper sentence structure. Paragraph contains consistent sentence fragments and capitalization and punctuation errors.
Overall Effectivenes	Excellent Project is well planned out and executed. Original content and evidence support enhances and adds meaning beyond the novel.	Good Project is well planned out. Original Content and evidence supports adds meaning beyond the novel.	Satisfactory Project could be better planned out and executed to increase effectiveness. Original content and evidence support reflects meaning of the novel.	Fair Project is not effective in its execution. Connections between the original content created and the novel are not clear.	Poor Project is ineffective. No connection between original content created and the novel.

Keywords:

English, Novel, Project

Subjects:

English

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric