Skip to main content
iRubric: Human Impacts on Environment Project rubric

iRubric: Human Impacts on Environment Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Human Impacts on Environment Project 
Rubric Code: ZX59567
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Title

Good

Title of presentation is given. Topic being addressed is clear to the audience.

+2 pts
Fair

Title of topic is given. Topic being addressed is not made clear to the audience.

+1 pt
Poor

No title is provided.




+0 pts
Organization

Good

The introduction is clear and addresses the topic. The main ideas are in a logical sequence. The flow of the presentation is good and the ideas are well connected. The conclusion is clearly given.

+6-4 pts
Fair

The introduction is not clearly presented. The main ideas are sometimes logically sequence, but out of order at points. The flow of the paper could use improvements. The conclusion is a little foggy.

+3-2 pts
Poor

There was no real introduction given. The sequencing of topics is unorganized, which leads to sloppy flow. The conclusion could use some work.


+1 pts
Content

All items should be clearly described and supported by scientific evidence.

Good

Presentation should include a discussion of all the following content points:
1. Summary of the problem or event
2. Causes of the problem or event
3. How the ecosystem is being affected/altered
4. Biotic and abiotic factors being affected
5. Measures being done to correct the problem or rectify the event
6. Short and long-term ecological effects
Visual Aid- powerpoint, poster, etc.
+7-10 pts
Fair

Presentation includes a discussion of at least 4 of the content points (in column to the left).


+6-3 pts
Poor

Presentation contains at least two of the content points.



+2-0 pts
Bibliography

Good

Bibliography included in the presentation with sources cited. No Wikipedia cources. At least 3 credible references.

+3 pts
Fair

Bibliography lists less than 3 references.





+1 pts
Poor

No bibliography/references given.




+0 pts
Metacognitive Reflection

Good

A written reflection that addresses all of the questions listed in the information sheet. Includes how this affects us now and how it will affect future generations.

+4-3 pts
Fair

A written reflection that addresses three or less of the questions listed for the reflection. Missing how it affects us or future generations.

+2-1 pts
Poor

Did not answer the questions and complete a reflection. Does not include a discussion about affects on us and future generations.


+0 pts




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16