Skip to main content
iRubric: Semester FINAL Project: German 3 (Board) Game rubric

iRubric: Semester FINAL Project: German 3 (Board) Game rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Semester FINAL Project: German 3 (Board) Game 
You will create a German board game that covers what we've done this term including GRAMMAR, VOCABULARY, CULTURE, & OTHER categories. It must include at least 35 questions and answers in German that range from easy to complex, and you MUST be able to answer them all for your game. ALL games are due on our final exam week.
Rubric Code: ZX42CWA
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Academic Content / Presentation
  Poor

5 pts

Fair

7 pts

Good

8.5 pts

Super

10 pts

35 Questions?Answers? - Rough Draft

Poor

3 or more of these: late, incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging.
Fair

A fair selection of questions, but with 2 of the following: late, incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging. Game cards made for each question.
Good

Good overall and covers material from all units, but with 1 of the following: late, incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging. Game cards are made for each question.
Super

On time, thorough, relevant, good range of difficulty, show attention to detail, evenly distributed from all units this winter. Game cards made for each question.
Accuracy of Content

Poor

Several information cards made for the game are not accurate.
Fair

All but 7 of the information cards made for the game are correct.
Good

All but 4 of the information cards made for the game are correct.
Super

All information cards made for the game are correct.
Instructional Effectiveness

Poor

The content is incidental. One can play without learning much.
Fair

Significant cognitive effort is spent on things that have nothing to do with the content.
Good

Winning and learning are closely entwined, though some mental effort is spent on aspects that are just about the game.
Super

Winning the game requires learning the content. The two are matched completely.
Presentation of Game

Poor

Did not participate much in presenting of game or did not say much or just spoke in English
Fair

Participated some in presentation of game. Perhaps some English and some French. Knew game.
Good

Good knowledge of game and able to explain to class. Used French mostly.
Super

Very active in the presentation of the game, knew the game inside and out and able to explain clearly and exclusively in French
Use of French

Poor

Almost none.
Fair

Some.
Good

Most of the board, rules, etc. presented in French
Super

Title, Board, rules, etc. all presented in correct French
Participation (within group, ranked

Poor

Almost none.
Fair

Limited; made no effort to increase knowledge to help out.
Good

Made some effort but still left others with brunt of work.
Super

Participated fully and found ways to build on knowledge through process.
The Game Itself
  Poor

5 pts

Fair

7 pts

Good

8.5 pts

Super

10 pts

Rules

Poor

Unwritten.
Fair

Rules were written, but some difficulty figuring out the game.
Good

Rules were written, but one part of the game needed slightly more explanation.
Super

Rules were written completely and clearly enough so that all could easily participate. All in German.
Attractiveness

Poor

Little or no color, fewer than 3 graphics.
Fair

Contrasting color and 1 original graphic.
Good

Contrasting color and at least 3 original graphics.
Super

Many Contrasting colors and at least 5 original graphics.
Creativity

Poor

Little thought was put into making the game interesting and fun.
Fair

The group tried to make the game interesting and fun, but some parts of it were hard to understand/enjoy.
Good

The group put some thought into making the game intersting and fun to play by using textures, fancy writing, game pieces and /or interesting characters and board.
Super

The group put a lot of thought into making the game fun and interesting to play as shown by creative questions, game pieces, and/or game board.
Theme

Poor

Little evidence showing the game had a theme.
Fair

A theme was somewhat evident.
Good

A theme was evident.
Super

A clear theme was chosen from those we studied this term and the theme was abundantly clear in all aspects of the game.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16