Skip to main content
iRubric: A Breviary or The Blessing Cup rubric

iRubric: A Breviary or The Blessing Cup rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
A Breviary or The Blessing Cup 
Theology of Prayer: A Prayer Book
Rubric Code: Z495AX
By treiger
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric A Breviary
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Content Quality
30 %

Poor

The prayers and readings are vaguely related to the theme selected for each week.

The content of the book indicates minimal to no research.

The prayers are vaguely biblically-oriented.

The themes for each of the four weeks are not thought out according to the main topic selected and the target audience.

The theological component is not evident in the book.
Fair

The prayers and readings are somewhat related to the theme selected for each week.

The content of the book indicates some research.

The prayers are somewhat biblically-oriented.

The themes for each of the four weeks are weakly thought-out according to the main topic selected and the target audience.

The theological component of the book is minimally evident and is somewhat consistent with the main theme of the book.
Good

The prayers and readings are closely related to the theme selected for each week.

The content of the book indicates decent research.

The prayers are mostly biblically-oriented.

The themes for each of the four weeks are decently thought out according to the main topic selected and the target audience.

The theological component of the prayer book is evident and is mostly consistent with the main theme of the book.
Excellent

The prayers and readings are fully relative to the theme selected for each week.

The content of the book indicates thorough research.

The prayers are biblically-oriented.

The themes for each of the four weeks are well thought out according to the main topic selected and the target audience.

The theological component of the book is indicated throughout the book and is consistent with the main theme of the book.
Creativity Component
20 %

Poor

The group incorporated 1 to zero types of creative genre throughout the book.

The book contains little to no original artistic elements originating from group members.

The design of the book is not very pleasing to the eye or spiritually uplifting.

The cover of the prayer book is unattractive and unrelated to the chosen them of the project.
Fair

The book is somewhat aesthetically pleasing having incorporated a minimum of two different types of creative genres throughout the book.

The book contains few original artistic elements originating from group members.

The design of the book is average. The layout is somewhat pleasing to the eye and spiritually uplifting.

The cover of the prayer book is boring and is vaguely related to the chosen them of the project.
Good

The book is aesthetically pleasing having incorporated a minimum of three different types of creative genres throughout the book.

The book contains some original artistic elements originating from group members.

The design of the book is well-done. The layout is pleasing to the eye and and is spiritually uplifting.

The cover of the prayer book is attractive to readers and is fitting for the chosen theme of the project.
Excellent

The book is aesthetically pleasing having incorporated a minimum of four different types of creative genres throughout the book.

The book contains original artistic elements originating from group members.

The design of the book is exceptional. The layout is pleasing to the eye and is spiritually uplifting.

The cover of the book captures the attention of the reader and is fitting for the chosen them of the project.
Collaboration
20 %

Poor

The tangible contribution of 1 team member is evident in the project.

1 member took on and completed responsibilities.

Members received mostly negative reviews from his/her group members.
Fair

The tangible contribution of at least 2 team members is evident in the project.

Few team members took on and completed responsibilities with average work , which in turn affected the overall quality of the project.

Members received few positive reviews from his/her group members.
Good

The tangible contribution of some team members is evident in the project.

Some team members took on and completed responsibilities with well-done work , which in turn affected the overall quality of the project.

Members received mostly positive reviews from his/her group members.
Excellent

The tangible contribution of each team member is evident in the project.

Every team member took on and completed responsibilities with excellence, which in turn affected the overall quality of the project.

Members received positive reviews from his/her group members.
Final Presentation
30 %

Poor

-Group members and roles

-The verbal component indicates that the presenters were not prepared.

-The final
Fair

-Group members and roles

-The verbal component indicates that the presenters were minimally prepared.

-The final
Good

-Group members and roles

-The verbal component indicates that the presenters were mostly prepared.

-The final
Excellent

-Group members and roles

-The verbal component indicates that the presenters were well prepared.

-The final presentation was very professional.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16