iRubric: Antigone Wiki rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Antigone Wiki

The class as a whole has been assigned the task of constructing a wiki on Sophocles' "Antigone." Each student has been assigned a particular character, event, or theme. Students are graded both for their work on their own page and for the edits that they make to other students' pages.

Rubric Code: Z3B5AW

By sconti

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: (none)

Enter rubric title
	Poor 0 pts	Needs Improvement 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Very Good 4 pts	Exceptional 5 pts
Timely Completion	Poor You wiki page had not been made, or only a title and an image are present, OR you vandalized the work of other students.	Needs Improvement Your page was not submitted in time for your peers to edit it. Also, your initial submission was below the required 250 words, and you did not include at least one appropriate image.	Fair Your page was not submitted in time for your peers to edit it. Also, you did not post the required 250 words in your initial submittion, or did not include at least one appropriate image.	Good Your page was not submitted in time for your peers to edit it. Also, you either did not post the required 250 words in your initial submission, or did not include at least one appropriate image. You (and not another student) added these before the 30th.	Very Good Your page was completed with enough time for your peers to edit it. However, you either did not post the required 250 words in your initial submission, or did not include at least one appropriate image. You (and not another student) added these before the 30th.	Exceptional Your page was completed with enough time for your peers to edit it. You included the required 250 words in your initial submission, as well as at least one appropriate image.
Writing	Poor You did not produce any work. OR You vandalized the work of other students.	Needs Improvement Your initial submission contained numerous spelling, grammar, punctuation and other technical errors, which hurt the readability of the text. The text was not informative, not clear, and/or not serious in tone.	Fair Your initial submission contained numerous spelling, grammar, punctuation and other errors. The text was either not informative, not clear, or not serious in tone.	Good Your initial submission was mostly free of technical errors, and was somewhat informative, clear, and serious in tone.	Very Good Your initial submission was mostly free of technical errors, and was reasonably informative, clear, and serious in tone.	Exceptional Your initial submission was almost completely free of technical errors, and was informative, clear, and serious in tone.
Edits	Poor You did not edit any of your peers' pages, OR you vandalized the work of other students.	Needs Improvement You performed only minor edits on only one of your peers' pages.	Fair You performed minor edits on only two of your peers' pages, OR you performed substantial edits on only one of your peers' pages.	Good You performed substantial edits on one of your peers' pages and minor edits on at least one other page.	Very Good You performed substantial edits on two of your peers' pages.	Exceptional You performed substantial edits on at more than two of your peers' pages.

Subjects:

English

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric