Skip to main content
iRubric: Oral performance skills Phnetics 1 rubric

iRubric: Oral performance skills Phnetics 1 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Oral performance skills Phnetics 1 
IPA Transcription - PHONETICS 1
This rubric will be useful for the assessment of oral performance skills at undergraduate level.
Rubric Code: Z2XWX98
By Cecilia1507
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric IPA Transcription - PHONETICS 1
  Needs Improvement

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Very good

(N/A)

Phonemes

Needs Improvement

The student has unsuccessfully produced the phonological realisation of a short text. The repertoir pf phonemes has not been successfully employed. A thorough practice, study and performance of phonemes is advised.
Fair

The student has poorly produced the phonological realisation of a short text. The repertoir pf phonemes has not been successfully employed in most sections of the text.
Good

The student has accurately produced the phonemes of most of the text. The repertoir of phonemes has been produced with minimal degree of difficulty.
Very good

The student has accurately produced the segments of a short text. The repertoir pf phonemes has been mastered.
Processes: Assimilation of voice

Needs Improvement

The student has unsuccessfully produced the progressive or regressive influence of some sounds on the voicing of neighbouring sounds. A thorough study and analysis of the context of occurrence of assimilation of voice is advised as well as the practice of the process.
Fair

The student has poorly produced the progressive or regressive influence of some sounds on the voicing of neighbouring sounds. There seems to be high interference of mother tongue phonological realisation.
Good

The student has accurately produced the progressive or regressive influence of sounds on the voicing of neighbouring sounds in most of the contexts of occurrence.
Very good

The student has accurately produced the progressive or regressive influence of some sounds on the voicing of neighbouring sounds.
Linking features

Needs Improvement

The student has failed to produce linking features. The analysis of the contexts for economy of effort and higher fluency has not been performed. A thorough study and analysis of the context of occurrence of linking features is advised.
Fair

The student has poorly produced linking features. The analysis of the contexts for economy of effort and higher fluency has not been carefully performed.
Good

The student has produced linking features in most of the suitable contexts in the text. The analysis of the contexts for economy of effort and higher fluency has been performed with some degree of difficulty or distraction.
Very good

The student has accurately produced linking features. The analysis of the contexts for economy of effort and higher fluency has been carefully performed.
Gradation

Needs Improvement

The student has failed to produce the strong and weak forms of function words in suitable phonological contexts. The analysis of the word categories and their production in context has not been performed. A thorough study and analysis of gradation choices is advised.
Fair

The student has poorly produced the strong and weak forms of function words in suitable phonological contexts. The analysis of the word categories and their production in context has been performed with difficulty.
Good

The student has accurately produced the strong and weak forms of function words in most suitable phonological contexts. The analysis of the word categories and their production in context has been performed with some degree of difficulty.
Very good

The student has accurately produced the strong and weak forms of function words in suitable phonological contexts. The analysis of the word categories and their production in context has been successfully performed.
Fluency

Needs Improvement

The student has failed to produce, phonemes, processes of assimilation and linking features in the flow of speech. The analysis of the elements previously mentioned is advised.
Fair

The student has poorly produced, phonemes, processes of assimilation and linking features in the flow of speech. The analysis of the elements previously mentioned is advised.
Good

The student has accurately produced, phonemes, processes of assimilation and linking features in the flow of speech in most of the cases. The production of the elements previously mentioned has been performed with certain degree of dificulty.
Very good

The student has accurately produced, phonemes, processes of assimilation and linking features in the flow of speech. The production of the elements previously mentioned has been succesfully performed.



Keywords:
  • oral performance skills


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98