- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Programming Assignment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Programming Assignment Programming Assignment High emphasis on execution and correctness. Less emphasis on quality of code. Rubric Code: Z2W852W By cnggjulio Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Computers Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Programming 100 % Enter rubric description
	Poor (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Good (N/A)
Implementation 60 %
Correctness 30 pts How correct is the output of the program	Poor Program does not work correctly, output is wrong most of the time or there is no output	Fair Program works correctly in general in most areas but not in all areas	Good Program works correctly in all areas and generates correct output
Execution 30 pts How smoothly does the program execute - are there any bugs	Poor Program does not execute	Fair Program executes but crashes in some areas	Good Program executes perfectly
Quality of Code 40 %
Code Structure 10 pts Structure of code, use of functions and procedures, code segmentation	Poor Long code segments, improper usage of functions, functions with side effects	Fair Code structure needs work	Good Code structure has perfectly followed guidelines. Short code segments, proper use of functions
Comments 10 pts Code is commented properly	Poor Code is not commented at all	Fair Code is commented but not sufficiently	Good Code is sufficiently commented with comments on every file, code segment, variable, and function.
Naming Convension 10 pts How closely is the naming convension for variables, functions, and files are followed	Poor Names are too cryptic, inconsistent, or do not follow any convension	Fair Names follow the convensions in most part, but need work	Good All names are easy to understand, consistent (in both wording and capitalization) and follow the guidelines
Style 5 pts How closely are styling conventions for comments, indentation, and code structure is followed	Poor Not followed at all, or poorly followed	Fair Followed for the most part	Good Followed all the time
Code Reuse 5 pts How well code reuse is implemented	Poor Too much redundancy in code	Fair Occasional code redundancy	Good No code redundancy