Skip to main content

iRubric: Interview--Success in Academia and the Workplace rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Interview--Success in Academia and the Workplace 
Rubric Code: Z2B76B
By carolynbayer
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Interview--Success
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Job explanation

Poor

The report is vague and lacking substance or sufficient details.
Fair

The report gives an overview of the interviewee's job, but does not fully explain what the person does.
Good

The report adequately expresses what the interviewee's job is, but is not highly detailed.
Excellent

The report is a detailed and accurate description of what the interviewee's job entails.
Questions

Poor

The questions are vague and do not address the manner in which the interviewee reached his or her academic and workplace goals.
Fair

The questions are good, but do not dig deeply to decifer from the interviewee what is needed for success in adacemia and the workplace.
Good

The questions are appropriate to elicit the responses needed to address success in academia and the workplace.
Excellent

The questions are insightful and clearly address the subject of success in academia and the workplace.
Analysis

Poor

The student skims the surface of what the interviewee said. There is no thoughtful analysis.
Fair

The student
explains, but there is little elaboration or deep thought about the interviewee's academic and workplace achieve-ments.
Good

The student explains, but does not expand fully about their opinions of how the interviewee achieved academic and workplace success.
Excellent

The student fully considers and explains their impressions of what the person they interviewed did to become successful.
Format

Poor

The paper is incorrectly formatted.
Fair

The paper is lacking more than one element of correct MLA format.
Good

The paper is neat in appearance, but is lacking either the correct header, 12 point font, correct margins, or is not properly spaced.
Excellent

The paper is neat in appearance and adheres to MLA format, including the correct header, 12 point font, correct margins, and double-spacing.
Mechanics

Poor

The paper has several grammatical or spelling errors.
Fair

The paper has more than one grammatical or spelling error.
Good

The paper has either one grammatical error or one spelling error.
Excellent

The paper has no grammatical errors that interfere with understanding. There are no spelling errors.



Keywords:
  • interview, success in academia and workplace

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224