Skip to main content

iRubric: Creature Presentation Evaluation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Creature Presentation Evaluation 
Creature Presentation Evaluation
Rubric Code: YXXB468
By issac1000
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Creature Presentation Evaluation
  Unsatisfactory

1 pts

Poor

2 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Eye Contact/ Speech

Unsatisfactory

Students makes little too no eye contact.
Reads directly off of the PowerPoint word for word.
Use of a lot of sentence fillers like "uhm".
Poor

Some eye contact is made once in awhile.
Not very confident in PowerPoint information and usually reads off of it.
Fair

Decent amount of eye contact.
Knows a fair amount of the information but still uses the PowerPoint for information.
Good

Has eye contact most of the time during presentation.
Pretty confident in the PowerPoint information, uses notes once in awhile.
Excellent

Almost always engaging the audience with eye contact.
Knows the PowerPoint very well and does not look at presentation or notes too often.
Timing/ Pace

Unsatisfactory

Speeds through the presentation.
Poor

Pretty fast paced through the presentation.
Fair

Goes at an okay pace, speeds through some parts.
Good

Pace is consistent and good through most of the presentation.
Excellent

Pace is consistent through the majority of the presentation.
Organization of material

Unsatisfactory

Presentation topics do not follow a well put together order that makes sense.
Poor

Presentation topics show little order that makes sense.
Fair

Presentation topics show decent order that makes some sense.
Good

Presentation topics show a pretty good order that makes sense.
Excellent

Presentation topics are organized in a very well thought out manner.
Content of Presentation

Unsatisfactory

Doesn't have all of the components of the presentation that was asked for.
Poor

Has some of the components that were asked for.
Fair

Has about half of the components asked for.
Good

Has most of the components that were asked for.
Excellent

Has all of the components of the presentation that was asked for.
Resources

Unsatisfactory

Does not use scholarly websites/books/articles for researched information.
Does not cite resources correctly.
(uses Wikipedia)
Poor

Uses some scholarly websites/books/articles; uses a lot of information from Wikipedia.
Resources are not cited correctly.
Fair

Decent amount of scholarly websites/books/articles used.
Sources cited but not completely accurately.
Good

Majority of scholarly websites/books/articles used.
Sources are cited and mostly correct.
Excellent

All of the information used from scholarly websites/books/articles.
Everything is cited completely and correctly.
Research

Unsatisfactory

Spends no effort or time researching during class period.
Poor

Spends little effort or time researching during class period.
Fair

Spends a fair amount of class time researching.
Good

Spends majority of time in class researching.
Excellent

Spends every bit of time researching in class.
Knowledge of Material

Unsatisfactory

Does not understand material put into the presentation.
Lots of information added that cannot be explained further with questions asked by audience.
Poor

Understands some of the material added to the presentation.
Most information added that cannot be explained further with questions asked by audience.
Fair

Understands a fair amount of material in presentation. Some information added that cannot be explained further with questions asked by audience.
Good

Understands majority of the material in presentation.
Minor information added that cannot be explained further with questions asked by audience.
Excellent

Understands just about all of the material in the presentation.
Minimal information added that cannot be explained further with questions asked by audience.
PowerPoint Engagement

Unsatisfactory

Use of a lot of obnoxious and hard to see color schemes, transitions and pictures.
Too much text for audience to understand and read while listening to presentation.
Poor

Uses a majority of obnoxious and hard to see color schemes, transitions and pictures.
Too much text for audience to understand and read while listening to presentation.
Fair

Some obnoxious color schemes or transitions are used.
Some text is hard for audience to understand and read while listening to presentation.
Good

Minimal obnoxious colors or transitions used.
Majority of text is readable and understandable for audience while listening to presentation.
Excellent

No obnoxious colors or transitions are used.
All of the text is readable and understandable for the audience.
Citation

Unsatisfactory

Uses in-text citations.
Does not cite images used.
Doesn't have a citation slide.
Poor

Uses some in-text citations.
Cites some of the images used.
Citation slide with missing citations.
Fair

Does not use in-text citations.
Cites half of the images used.
Citation slide with most citations.
Good

Does not use in-text citations.
Cites images.
Citation slide with majority of the citations there.
Excellent

Does not use in-text citations.
All images are cited.
Citation slide is 100% accurate.
Partner Evaluation

Unsatisfactory

You and your partner shared most of the assignment 0/50
You and your partner did not communicate information or help.
Poor

You and your partner shared most of the assignment 20/50.
You and your partner did not communicate very well or help each other that well.
Fair

You and your partner shared most of the assignment 30/50.
You and your partner communicated pretty decently and sort of helped each other.
Good

You and your partner shared most of the assignment 40/50.
You and your partner communicated information well and helped each other for the most part with questions or concerns.
Excellent

You and your partner shared all assignment 50/50.
You and your partner communicated very well and helped each other throughout.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58