iRubric: Trial of Catcher in the Rye rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Trial of Catcher in the Rye

Rubric Code: YXX3XX

By heyemilina

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Trial of Catcher in the Rye
	Advanced 4 pts	Proficient 3 pts	Basic 2 pts	Below Basic 1 pts
Bibliography format	Advanced	Proficient Bibliography was in the correct MLA format, including margins, font, spacing, and formatting of sources.	Basic Bibliography was mostly in correct MLA format, with few errors in margins, font, spacing, and formatting of sources.	Below Basic No bibliography or bibliography format was incorrect in many ways, including margins, font, spacing, and formatting of souces.
Sources	Advanced All sources were extremely appropriate and varied in content.	Proficient All sources (at least 3) were appropriate and varied in content.	Basic Most sources (at least were appropriate and varied somewhat in content.	Below Basic Sources did not exist or were inappropriate to the assignment.
Annotations	Advanced Annotations demonstrated extensive understanding of content. Student clearly evaluated the content to determine the author's purpose. Annotations clearly demonstrated the relevance of all the sources to the argument.	Proficient Annotations demonstrated understanding of content. Student evaluated the content to determine the author's purpose. Annotations cdemonstrated the relevance of all the sources to the argument.	Basic Annotations demonstrated some understanding of content. Student evaluated, to an extent, the content to determine the author's purpose. Annotations demonstrated the relevance of some of the sources to the argument.	Below Basic Annotations were missing or demonstrated little or no understanding of the content, making the relevance of the sources to the argument unclear or missing.
Summary of Argument	Advanced Summary of criticisms was presented in a clear, efficient manner that conveyed the importance of the critcisms to the argument.	Proficient Summary of criticisms was presented in a manner that conveyed the importance of the critcisms to the argument.	Basic Summary of criticisms was presented in a manner that mostly conveyed the importance of the critcisms to the argument.	Below Basic Summary of criticisms was missing or confusing/did not convey the importance of the criticisms to the argument.
Evaluation of Argument	Advanced Student effectively and clearly evaluated and proved the importance and quality of the literary criticisms to the student's argument.	Proficient Student evaluated and proved the importance and quality of the literary criticisms to the student's argument.	Basic Student evaluated and proved parts of the importance and quality of the literary criticisms to the student's argument.	Below Basic Student did not evaluate or prove the importance of the quality of the literary criticisms to the student's argument.

Subjects:

English

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric